Economy and Markets

The market has been maintaining its recent trends since our last newsletter - GDP growth is moderate, inflation is low and indices keep inching higher, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq showing particularly robust gains. Year-to-date (as of July 24th), the S&P 500 is up 10.33% to 2,469, the Nasdaq has returned 18.87% to 6,399, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up 8.97% to 21,535. The biggest gains in the S&P have been attributable to the tech sector (+22.78%), healthcare (+17.46%), consumer discretionary (+11.91%) and materials (+10.92%), which were offset primarily by telecommunications (-14.69%) and energy (-13.53%).

Although housing starts increased slightly in June to 1.2 million (up from 1.1 million in May), homebuilder sentiment has dipped. The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo builder sentiment index declined 2 points in July to 64, the lowest level since November. [Note: readings above 50 indicate more builders view sales conditions as good rather than poor. The index has been above 60 since September.] NAHB attributes the pessimism to concerns regarding higher material costs, particularly lumber, which is hurting housing affordability despite higher demand. Data released this week by S&P Dow Jones Indices (the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Home Price Index) shows that home prices have continued to rise across the country over the last 12 months.

Data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis shows that 13 of 22 industry groups contributed to the overall 1.4% increase in GDP in the first quarter - with gains led by real estate, mining, durable goods and manufacturing.

Jobless claims fell sharply this month, from 248,000 to 233,000 Initial jobless claims, pointing to a continued tightening in the labor market.

The market P/E is stable at 24.35.

Recommended Reading

Many subscribers are familiar with Validea's Guru Investor blog (launched in 2008)), in which we offer highlights of interesting articles and investment commentary that is helpful to investors and that we believe stands out from the daily market noise. In case you missed our recent posts, here's a short list:



Performance Update

Since our last newsletter, the S&P 500 returned 1.1%, while the Hot List returned 1.6%. So far in 2016, the portfolio has returned 8.8% vs. 10.6% for the S&P. Since its inception in July 2003, the Hot List is far outpacing the index, having gained 237.0% vs. the S&P's 147.4% gain.

The Fallen

As we rebalance the Validea Hot List, 3 stocks leave our portfolio. These include: Ameris Bancorp (ABCB), Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) and Ipg Photonics Corporation (IPGP).

The Keepers

7 stocks remain in the portfolio. They are: Magna International Inc. (Usa) (MGA), Credit Acceptance Corp. (CACC), Sanderson Farms, Inc. (SAFM), Argan, Inc. (AGX), Banco Macro Sa (Adr) (BMA), Evercore Partners Inc. (EVR) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD).

The New Additions

We are adding 3 stocks to the portfolio. These include: Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN), Netease Inc (Adr) (NTES) and Lemaitre Vascular Inc (LMAT).

Latest Changes

Additions  
HUDSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HDSN
NETEASE INC (ADR) NTES
LEMAITRE VASCULAR INC LMAT
Deletions  
AMERIS BANCORP ABCB
FOOT LOCKER, INC. FL
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION IPGP


Are Small-Caps Small Potatoes?

The small-cap universe doesn't hold the appeal it did in the wake of last year's presidential election, and investors have pulled back more than they have over the past decade. As high hopes for corporate tax reduction and the new administration's focus on domestic businesses fizzled, so did the shine on the small-cap group.

In an articlefrom 2014, Alex Bryan of Morningstar discusses the small-cap premium, citing research that shows, "From 1927 through 1981, U.S. small-cap stocks outperformed large-caps by 3.1% annualized, according to the Fama-French 'Small Minus Big' factor." But the relative performance of small- and large-caps since 1980 shows a much lower (and sometimes absent) premium to small-cap investors. For example, using the Russell 2000 and Russell 1000 indices as proxies, small-caps have trailed large-caps by about 32% on a total return basis over the last 6.5 years - a hefty lag.

The notion of a small-cap premium is centered on liquidity, risk and mispricing. As Bryan points out, small-cap stocks that are less liquid carry more "liquidity risk" because they are harder to buy and sell, particularly the very small "micro-caps". Small-cap companies are also typically overshadowed by their large-cap peers with respect to analyst coverage--there may be developments and/or innovations in the small cap space that go unnoticed for some time, if not completely. This lack of transparency also means it takes more time for information to get priced into valuations, which presents opportunity for investors. Any development or news item regarding a big tech name, on the other hand, will be featured immediately on countless media outlets and priced in just as quickly.

According to a recent article in ETF Trends, small-cap stocks "bounced back more than twice as fast as large-caps after the tech crash in the early 2000s, and 14 months faster than large-caps following the credit crisis in 2008." This is consistent with some of Bryan's data that shows how small-caps as a group can be streaky with respect to returns. Small-caps are also more domestically concentrated, which means (theoretically) they are less exposed to global events and currency risks. And, since companies in this asset class typically have less debt, rising interest rates have a lesser impact than on larger, more leveraged companies.

Clearly, if the new administration's tax reform policies come to fruition, smaller companies are poised to benefit from lower corporate tax rates - but it remains to be seen if these policies will push through. In the meantime, however, there are opportunities inherent in those small-caps with strong fundamentals - not just those that fit the bill with respect to market capitalization. Since smaller companies can tend toward less experienced management teams and less diversified business operations, small-caps still hold more risk than the larger, household names, but greater risk often leads to greater returns.

So, as the Morningstar article points out, over the very long term there is a small-cap premium, but over the last few market cycles it has all but been forgotten. However, this research lumps together all small caps, whether good, bad or ugly. As the following chart shows, the premium in small-caps weighted by value, deep value and even growth have exhibited strong outperformance since the early 80s.



One of Validea's very best performers is a model that is focused on finding fundamentally sound small caps that are exhibiting growth and momentum. The Small Cap Growth portfolio has outperformed the S&P 500 for 12 out of the 15 years since its inception. While this asset class is not performing as well year-to-date, it's important to note that at the end of last year the market had priced in optimism regarding the new administration's pro-domestic policies (perhaps without considering implementation risks). The stock screening models I created based on the investing philosophies of some of Wall Street's most successful gurus, however, takes such influences out of the equation and focus on underlying operating fundamentals.

If you are going to invest in small-caps, it's important to understand that the small-cap premium has diminished. That said, by coupling small-cap stocks with fundamental screening, you increase your chance for long term success.

Newcomers to the Hot List

Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN):

Hudson Technologies, Inc. is refrigerant services company offering products and services primarily used in commercial air conditioning, industrial processing and refrigeration systems. The company passes the tests of my strategies based on Peter Lynch, the Motley Fool and Martin Zweig. Full details

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT):

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. is a provider of medical devices for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. The Company develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and implants used primarily in the field of vascular surgery. It passes the tests of my strategies based on Peter Lynch and the Motley Fool. Full details

NetEase, Inc. (ADR) (NTES):

NetEase Inc. is a technology company that operates an interactive online community in China and is a provider of Chinese language content and services through its online games, Internet media, e-mail, e-commerce and other businesses. The company passes the tests of my strategies based on Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch. Full details

Portfolio Holdings
Ticker Date Added Return
BMA 7/1/2016 18.9%
WD 3/10/2017 21.0%
MGA 6/2/2017 4.0%
AGX 5/5/2017 -5.8%
SAFM 11/18/2016 58.3%
CACC 6/30/2017 -3.2%
HDSN 7/28/2017 TBD
EVR 6/30/2017 12.3%
NTES 7/28/2017 TBD
LMAT 7/28/2017 TBD


Guru Analysis
Disclaimer: The analysis is from Validea's selection and interpretation of content from the guru's book or published writings, and is not from nor endorsed by the guru. See Full Disclaimer

BMA   |   WD   |   MGA   |   AGX   |   SAFM   |   CACC   |   HDSN   |   EVR   |   NTES   |   LMAT   |  

BANCO MACRO SA (ADR)

Strategy: Patient Investor
Based on: Warren Buffett

Banco Macro SA is an Argnetina-based financial institution (the Bank) that offers traditional bank products and services to companies, including those operating in regional economies, as well as to individuals. In addition, the Bank performs certain transactions through its subsidiaries, including mainly Banco del Tucuman, Macro Bank Ltd, Macro Securities SA, Macro Fiducia SA and Macro Fondos SGFCI SA. It has approximately two categories of customers, such as retail customers, including individuals and entrepreneurs and corporate customers, which include small, medium and large companies and major corporations. In addition, it provides services to over four provincial governments. It provides its corporate customers with traditional banking products and services, such as deposits, lending (including overdraft facilities), check cashing advances and factoring, guaranteed loans and credit lines for financing foreign trade and cash management services.

STAGE 1: "Is this a Buffett type company?"

A bedrock principle for Buffett is that his type of company has a "durable competitive advantage" as compared to being a "price competitive" or "commodity" type of business. Companies with a "durable competitive advantage" are more likely to be found in these sub-industries: Brand Name Fast Food Restaurants, Brand Name Beverages, Brand Name Foods, Brand Name Toiletries and Household Products, Brand Name Clothing, Brand Name Prescription Drugs, Advertising, Advertising Agencies, TV, Newspapers, Magazines, Direct Mail, Repetitive Services for Businesses, Low Cost Producers of Insurance, furniture, or Low Cost Retailers. While you should be easily able to explain where the company's pricing power comes from (i.e. a strong regional brand image, a business tollgate, its main products are #1 or # 2 in its field and has been on the market for years and hasn't changed at all, a consumer or business ends up buying the same product many times in a year, etc. or having the lowest production cost among its competition), there are certain figures that one can look at that can qualify the company as having a durable competitive advantage.


LOOK FOR EARNINGS PREDICTABILITY: PASS

Buffett likes companies to have solid, stable earnings that are continually expanding. This allows him to accurately predict future earnings. Annual earnings per share from earliest to most recent were 0.04, 0.06, 0.10, 0.09, 0.12, 0.16, 0.26, 0.37, 0.53, 0.69. Buffett would consider BMA's earnings predictable, although earnings have declined 1 time(s) in the past seven years, with the most recent decline 7 years ago. The dips have totaled 10.0%. BMA's long term historical EPS growth rate is 36.8%, based on the 10 year average EPS growth rate, and it is expected to grow earnings 17.1% per year in the future, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate. For the purposes of our analysis, we will use the more conservative of the two EPS growth numbers.


LOOK FOR CONSISTENTLY HIGHER THAN AVERAGE RETURN ON EQUITY: PASS

Buffett likes companies with above average return on equity of at least 15% or better, as this is an indicator that the company has a durable competitive advantage. US corporations have, on average, returned about 12% on equity over the last 30 years. The average ROE for BMA, over the last ten years, is 25.2%, which is high enough to pass. It is not enough that the average be at least 15%. For each of the last 10 years, with the possible exception of the last fiscal year, the ROE must be at least 10% for Buffett to feel comfortable that the ROE is consistent. In addition, the average ROE over the last 3 years must also exceed 15%. The ROE for the last 10 years, from earliest to latest, is 14.0%, 22.7%, 28.9%, 20.4%, 24.3%, 24.3%, 27.8%, 29.7%, 31.0%, 29.0%, and the average ROE over the last 3 years is 29.9%, thus passing this criterion.


LOOK FOR CONSISTENTLY HIGHER THAN AVERAGE RETURN ON ASSETS: PASS

Buffett also requires, for financial companies, that the average Return On Assets (ROA) be at least 1% and consistent. Return On Assets is defined as the net earnings of the business divided by the total assets of the business. The average ROA for BMA, over the last ten years, is 3.4%, which is high enough to pass. It is not enough that the average be at least 1%. For each of the last 10 years, with the possible exception of the last fiscal year, the ROA must be at least 1% for Buffett to feel comfortable that the ROA is consistent. The ROA for the last 10 years, from earliest to latest, is 1.9%, 2.9%, 3.6%, 2.5%, 2.8%, 3.1%, 4.1%, 4.6%, 4.7%, 4.1%, thus passing this criterion.


LOOK AT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: PASS

Buffett likes companies that do not have major capital expenditures. That is, he looks for companies that do not need to spend a ton of money on major upgrades of plant and equipment or on research and development to stay competitive. BMA's free cash flow per share of $10.93 is positive, indicating that the company is generating more cash that it is consuming. This is a favorable sign, and so the company passes this criterion.


LOOK AT MANAGEMENT'S USE OF RETAINED EARNINGS: PASS

Buffett likes to see if management has spent retained earnings in a way that benefits shareholders. To figure this out, Buffett takes the total amount of retained earnings over the previous ten years of $2.13 and compares it to the gain in EPS over the same period of $0.65. BMA's management has proven it can earn shareholders a 30.4% return on the earnings they kept. This return is more than acceptable to Buffett. Essentially, management is doing a great job putting the retained earnings to work.


HAS THE COMPANY BEEN BUYING BACK SHARES: BONUS PASS

Buffett likes to see falling shares outstanding, which indicates that the company has been repurchasing shares. This indicates that management has been using excess capital to increase shareholder value. BMA's shares outstanding have fallen over the past five years from 573,250,000 to 58,000,000, thus passing this criterion. This is a bonus criterion and will not adversely affect the ability of a stock to pass the strategy as a whole if it is failed.

The preceding concludes Buffett's qualitative analysis. If and when he gets positive responses to all the above criteria, he would then proceed with a price analysis. The price analysis will determine whether or not the stock should be bought. The following is how he would evaluate BMA quantitatively.

STAGE 2: "Should I buy at this price?" Although a firm may be a Buffett type company, he won't invest in it unless he can get a favorable price that allows him a great long term return.


CALCULATE THE INITIAL RATE OF RETURN: [No Pass/Fail]

Buffett compares his type of stocks to bonds, and likes to see what a company's initial rate of return is. To calculate the initial rate of return, take the trailing 12-month EPS of $6.69 and divide it by the current market price of $88.06. An investor, purchasing BMA, could expect to receive a 7.60% initial rate of return. Furthermore, he or she could expect the rate to increase 17.1% per year, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate, as this is how fast earnings are growing.


COMPARE THE INITIAL RATE OF RETURN WITH THE LONG-TERM TREASURY YIELD: PASS

Buffett favors companies in which the initial rate of return is around the long-term treasury yield. Nonetheless, he has invested in companies with low initial rates of return, as long as the yield is expected to expand rapidly. Currently, the long-term treasury yield is about 2.25%. Compare this with BMA's initial yield of 7.60%, which will expand at an annual rate of 17.1%, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate. The company is the better choice, as the initial rate of return is close to or above the long term bond yield and is expanding.


CALCULATE THE FUTURE EPS: [No Pass/Fail]

BMA currently has a book value of $23.36. It is safe to say that if BMA can preserve its average rate of return on equity of 25.2% and continues to retain 84.35% of its earnings, it will be able to sustain an earnings growth rate of 21.3% and it will have a book value of $160.66 in ten years. If it can still earn 25.2% on equity in ten years, then expected EPS will be $40.51.


CALCULATE THE FUTURE STOCK PRICE BASED ON THE AVERAGE ROE METHOD: [No Pass/Fail]

Now take the expected future EPS of $40.51 and multiply them by the lower of the 5 year average P/E ratio or current P/E ratio (13.1) (5 year average P/E in this case), which is 7.4 and you get BMA's projected future stock price of $298.55.


CALCULATE THE EXPECTED RATE OF RETURN BASED ON THE AVERAGE ROE METHOD: [No Pass/Fail]

Now add in the total expected dividend pool to be paid over the next ten years, which is $27.63. This gives you a total dollar amount of $326.19. These numbers indicate that one could expect to make a 14.0% average annual return on BMA's stock at the present time. Although, the return is slightly below the liking of Buffett, the return would still be somewhat acceptable.


CALCULATE THE EXPECTED FUTURE STOCK PRICE BASED ON AVERAGE EPS GROWTH: [No Pass/Fail]

If you take the EPS growth of 17.1%, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate, you can project EPS in ten years to be $32.52. Now multiply EPS in 10 years by the lower of the 5 year average P/E ratio or current P/E ratio (13.1) (5 year average P/E in this case), which is 7.4. This equals the future stock price of $239.65. Add in the total expected dividend pool of $27.63 to get a total dollar amount of $267.28.


CALCULATE THE EXPECTED RETURN USING THE AVERAGE EPS GROWTH METHOD: [No Pass/Fail]

Now you can figure out your expected return based on a current price of $88.06 and the future expected stock price, including the dividend pool, of $267.28. If you were to invest in BMA at this time, you could expect a 11.74% average annual return on your money. Buffett likes to see a 15% return, and would even go down to 12%.


LOOK AT THE RANGE OF EXPECTED RATE OF RETURN: PASS

Based on the two different methods, you could expect an annual compounding rate of return somewhere between 11.7% and 14.0%. To pinpoint the average return a little better, we have taken an average of the two different methods. Investors could expect an average return of 12.9% on BMA stock for the next ten years, based on the current fundamentals. Buffett likes to see a 15% return, but nonetheless would accept this return, thus passing the criterion.


WALKER & DUNLOP, INC.

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company, which conducts its operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC. The Company provides commercial real estate financial products and services primarily to developers and owners of multifamily properties. The Company originates, sells and services a range of multifamily and other commercial real estate financing products, including Multifamily Finance, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Finance, Capital Markets, and Proprietary Capital. It originates and sells loans through the programs of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac, and together with Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)), the Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) and the Federal Housing Administration, a division of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae, HUD).


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. WD's P/E is 11.00, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 19.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. WD's revenue growth is 24.75%, while it's earnings growth rate is 30.36%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates. Therefore, WD fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: PASS

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (68.2%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (47%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For WD this criterion has been met.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. WD's EPS ($1.35) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. WD's EPS for this quarter last year ($0.50) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. WD's growth rate of 170.00% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: PASS

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for WD is 15.18%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters, which are 56.72%, 45.45%, and 68.66%. WD passes this test, which means that it has good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: PASS

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 57.00%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is less than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 170.00%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock passes.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: PASS

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 170.00% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 30.36%. WD would therefore pass this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: FAIL

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. WD, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 1.31, 1.21, 1.58, 2.65, and 3.65, fails this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. WD's long-term growth rate of 30.36%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For WD, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 160, while insiders buying number 35). Despite the fact that insider sells out number insider buys for this company, Zweig considers even one insider buy transaction enough to prevent an insider sell signal, therefore there is not an insider sell signal and the stock passes this criterion.


MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC. (USA)

Strategy: Price/Sales Investor
Based on: Kenneth Fisher

Magna International Inc. (Magna) is a global automotive supplier. The Company's segments are North America, Europe, Asia, Rest of World, and Corporate and Other. The Company's product capabilities include producing body, chassis, exterior, seating, powertrain, electronic, active driver assistance, vision, closure, and roof systems and modules, as well as vehicle engineering and contract manufacturing. The Company has over 320 manufacturing operations and approximately 100 product development, engineering and sales centers in over 30 countries. It provides a range of body, chassis and engineering solutions to its original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers. It has capabilities in powertrain design, development, testing and manufacturing. It offers bumper fascia systems, exterior trim and modular systems. It offers exterior and interior mirror systems. It offers sealing, trim, engineered glass and module systems. It offers softtops, retractable hardtops, modular tops and hardtops.


PRICE/SALES RATIO: PASS

The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. Non-cyclical (non-Smokestack) companies with Price/Sales ratios below 0.75 are tremendous values and should be sought. MGA's P/S of 0.49 based on trailing 12 month sales, is below 0.75 which is considered quite attractive. It passes this methodology's P/S ratio test with flying colors.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

Less debt equals less risk according to this methodology. MGA's Debt/Equity of 29.33% is acceptable, thus passing the test.


PRICE/RESEARCH RATIO: PASS

This methodology considers companies in the Technology and Medical sectors to be attractive if they have low Price/Research ratios. MGA is neither a Technology nor Medical company. Therefore the Price/Research ratio is not available and, hence, not much emphasis should be placed on this particular variable.


PRELIMINARY GRADE: Some Interest in MGA At this Point

Is MGA a "Super Stock"? NO


PRICE/SALES RATIO: PASS

The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. Non-cyclical(non-Smokestack) companies with Price/Sales ratios below .75 are tremendous values and should be sought.MGA's P/S ratio of 0.49 is below .75 which is considered extremely attractive. It passes this methodology's P/S ratio test with flying colors.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH RATE: FAIL

This methodology looks for companies that have an inflation adjusted EPS growth rate greater than 15%. MGA's inflation adjusted EPS growth rate of 8.77% fails the test.


FREE CASH PER SHARE: PASS

This methodology looks for companies that have a positive free cash per share. Companies should have enough free cash available to sustain three years of losses. This is based on the premise that companies without cash will soon be out of business. MGA's free cash per share of 3.04 passes this criterion.


THREE YEAR AVERAGE NET PROFIT MARGIN: PASS

This methodology looks for companies that have an average net profit margin of 5% or greater over a three year period. MGA, whose three year net profit margin averages 5.77%, passes this evaluation.



ARGAN, INC.

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Argan, Inc. is a holding company. The Company conducts operations through its subsidiaries, Gemma Power Systems, LLC and affiliates (GPS), Atlantic Projects Company Limited (APC), Southern Maryland Cable, Inc. (SMC) and The Roberts Company (Roberts). Through GPS and APC, the Company's power industry services segment provides engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, operations management, maintenance, development, technical and consulting services to the power generation and renewable energy markets. Through SMC, the telecommunications infrastructure services segment of the Company provides project management, construction, installation and maintenance services to commercial, local government and federal government customers. Through Roberts, the Company's industrial fabrication and field services segment produces, delivers and installs fabricated steel components specializing in pressure vessels and heat exchangers for industrial plants.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider AGX a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: PASS

The investor should examine the P/E (12.97) relative to the growth rate (32.48%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for AGX (0.40) is very favorable.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: NEUTRAL

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth rate high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. AGX, whose sales are $775.2 million, is not considered large enough to apply the P/E ratio analysis. However, an investor can analyze the P/E ratio relative to the EPS growth rate.


INVENTORY TO SALES: PASS

When inventories increase faster than sales, it is a red flag. However an increase of up to 5% is considered bearable if all other ratios appear attractive. Inventory to sales for AGX was 0.99% last year, while for this year it is 0.47%. Since inventory to sales has decreased from last year by -0.51%, AGX passes this test.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for AGX is 32.5%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is acceptable.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

This methodology would consider the Debt/Equity ratio for AGX (0.00%) to be wonderfully low (equity is at least ten times debt). This ratio is one quick way to determine the financial strength of the company.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for AGX (23.65%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: BONUS PASS

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for AGX (50.13%) is considered very favorable.


SANDERSON FARMS, INC.

Strategy: Value Investor
Based on: Benjamin Graham

Sanderson Farms, Inc. is a poultry processing company. The Company is engaged in the production, processing, marketing and distribution of fresh and frozen chicken, and also preparation, processing, marketing and distribution of processed and minimally prepared chicken. It sells ice pack, chill pack, bulk pack and frozen chicken, in whole, cut-up and boneless form, under the Sanderson Farms brand name to retailers, distributors, casual dining operators, customers reselling frozen chicken into export markets. The Company, through its subsidiaries, Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Production Division) and Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Processing Division), conducts its chicken operations. Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Production Division) is engaged in the production of chickens to the broiler-stage. Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Foods Division) is engaged in the processing, sale and distribution of chickens. The Company, through Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Foods Division), conducts its prepared chicken business.


SECTOR: PASS

SAFM is neither a technology nor financial Company, and therefore this methodology is applicable.


SALES: PASS

The investor must select companies of "adequate size". This includes companies with annual sales greater than $340 million. SAFM's sales of $3,009.2 million, based on trailing 12 month sales, pass this test.


CURRENT RATIO: PASS

The current ratio must be greater than or equal to 2. Companies that meet this criterion are typically financially secure and defensive. SAFM's current ratio of 4.97 passes the test.


LONG-TERM DEBT IN RELATION TO NET CURRENT ASSETS: PASS

For industrial companies, long-term debt must not exceed net current assets (current assets minus current liabilities). Companies that meet this criterion display one of the attributes of a financially secure organization. The long-term debt for SAFM is $0.0 million, while the net current assets are $528.5 million. SAFM passes this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Companies must increase their EPS by at least 30% over a ten-year period and EPS must not have been negative for any year within the last 10 years. EPS for SAFM were negative within the last 10 years and therefore the company fails this criterion.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio, based on the greater of the current PE or the PE using average earnings over the last 3 fiscal years, must be "moderate", which this methodology states is not greater than 15. Stocks with moderate P/Es are more defensive by nature. SAFM's P/E of 13.40 (using the 3 year PE) passes this test.


PRICE/BOOK RATIO: FAIL

The Price/Book ratio must also be reasonable. That is, the Price/Book multiplied by P/E cannot be greater than 22. SAFM's Price/Book ratio is 2.28, while the P/E is 13.40. SAFM fails the Price/Book test.


CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP.

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Credit Acceptance Corporation offers financing programs that enable automobile dealers to sell vehicles to consumers. The Company's financing programs are offered through a network of automobile dealers. The Company has two Dealers financing programs: the Portfolio Program and the Purchase Program. Under the Portfolio Program, the Company advances money to dealers (Dealer Loan) in exchange for the right to service the underlying consumer loans. Under the Purchase Program, the Company buys the consumer loans from the dealers (Purchased Loan) and keeps the amounts collected from the consumer. Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as Loans. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's target market included approximately 60,000 independent and franchised automobile dealers in the United States. The Company has market area managers located throughout the United States that market its programs to dealers, enroll new dealers and support active dealers.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

CACC is considered a "Stalwart", according to this methodology, for its earnings growth of 17.04%. This is based on based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which lies within a moderate 10%-19% range. This methodology looks for the "Stalwart" securities to gain 30%-50% in value over a two year period if they can be purchased at an attractive price based on the P/E to Growth ratio. However, CACC is not considered a "True Stalwart" for its sales of $1,004 million are less than the multi-billion dollar level.


YIELD ADJUSTED P/E TO GROWTH (PEG) RATIO: PASS

The Yield-adjusted P/E/G ratio for CACC (0.84), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, is O.K.


EARNINGS PER SHARE: PASS

The EPS for a stalwart company must be positive. CACC's EPS ($17.39) would satisfy this criterion.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: NEUTRAL

CACC is a financial company so debt to equity rules are not applied to determine the company's financial soundness.


EQUITY/ASSETS RATIO: PASS

This methodology uses the Equity/Assets Ratio as a way to determine a financial intermediary's health, as it is a better measure than the Debt/Equity Ratio. CACC's Equity/Assets ratio (26.00%) is extremely healthy and above the minimum 5% this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


RETURN ON ASSETS: PASS

This methodology uses Return on Assets as a way to measure a financial intermediary's profitability. CACC's ROA (8.52%) is above the minimum 1% that this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for CACC (9.88%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for CACC (-58.08%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


HUDSON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Strategy: Price/Sales Investor
Based on: Kenneth Fisher

Hudson Technologies, Inc. is a refrigerant services company. The Company's products and services are primarily used in commercial air conditioning, industrial processing and refrigeration systems, and include refrigerant and industrial gas sales, refrigerant management services consisting primarily of reclamation of refrigerants and RefrigerantSide Services performed at a customer's site, consisting of system decontamination to remove moisture, oils and other contaminants. In addition, the Company's SmartEnergy OPS service is a Web-based real time continuous monitoring service applicable to a facility's refrigeration systems and other energy systems. The Company's Chiller Chemistry and Chill Smart services are also predictive and diagnostic service offerings. The Company sells reclaimed and virgin (new) refrigerants to a variety of customers in various segments of the air conditioning and refrigeration industry, and sells industrial gases to a variety of industry segments.


PRICE/SALES RATIO: FAIL

The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. Non-cyclical companies with Price/Sales ratios greater than 1.5 and less than 3 should not be purchased. HDSN's P/S ratio of 2.86 based on trailing 12 month sales, is above 1.5. If you are currently holding this stock, the P/S ratio is O.K., but if you are thinking about purchasing it, the stock would fail this methodology's first criterion.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

Less debt equals less risk according to this methodology. HDSN's Debt/Equity of 0.23% is acceptable, thus passing the test.


PRICE/RESEARCH RATIO: PASS

This methodology considers companies in the Technology and Medical sectors to be attractive if they have low Price/Research ratios. HDSN is neither a Technology nor Medical company. Therefore the Price/Research ratio is not available and, hence, not much emphasis should be placed on this particular variable.


PRELIMINARY GRADE: No Interest in HDSN At this Point

Is HDSN a "Super Stock"? NO


Price/Sales Ratio: FAIL

The Price/Sales ratio is the most important variable according to this methodology. The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. HDSN's Price/Sales ratio of 2.86 does not pass this criterion.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology looks for companies that have an inflation adjusted EPS growth rate greater than 15%. HDSN's inflation adjusted EPS growth rate of 18.23% passes this test.


FREE CASH PER SHARE: PASS

This methodology looks for companies that have a positive free cash per share. Companies should have enough free cash available to sustain three years of losses. This is based on the premise that companies without cash will soon be out of business. HDSN's free cash per share of 0.22 passes this criterion.


THREE YEAR AVERAGE NET PROFIT MARGIN: FAIL

This methodology looks for companies that have an average net profit margin of 5% or greater over a three year period. HDSN's three year net profit margin, which averages 4.92%, does not pass this criterion.


EVERCORE PARTNERS INC.

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

Evercore Partners Inc. is an independent investment banking advisory company. The Company operates through two business segments: Investment Banking and Investment Management. The Company's Investment Banking segment includes its Advisory services, through which Evercore provides advice to clients on mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and other strategic corporate transactions, with a particular focus on advising multinational corporations and private equity firms on various transactions. Its Investment Management segment focuses on Institutional Asset Management, through which Evercore manages financial assets for institutional investors and provide independent fiduciary services to corporate employee benefit plans; Wealth Management, through which it provides wealth management services for high-net-worth individuals, and Private Equity, through which it manages private equity funds. Private Equity holds interests in entities that manage middle-market private equity funds in Mexico.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. EVR's P/E is 19.41, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 19.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. EVR's revenue growth is 22.24%, while it's earnings growth rate is 31.52%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates. Therefore, EVR fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: PASS

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (50.5%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (9.4%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For EVR this criterion has been met.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. EVR's EPS ($1.76) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. EVR's EPS for this quarter last year ($0.12) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. EVR's growth rate of 1,366.67% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: PASS

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for EVR is 15.76%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters, which are 111.54%, 393.75%, and 117.78%. EVR passes this test, which means that it has good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: PASS

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 166.67%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is less than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 1,366.67%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock passes.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: PASS

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 1,366.67% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 31.52%. EVR would therefore pass this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: FAIL

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. EVR, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 0.88, 1.46, 2.08, 0.98, and 2.43, fails this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. EVR's long-term growth rate of 31.52%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For EVR, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 199, while insiders buying number 2). Despite the fact that insider sells out number insider buys for this company, Zweig considers even one insider buy transaction enough to prevent an insider sell signal, therefore there is not an insider sell signal and the stock passes this criterion.


NETEASE INC (ADR)

Strategy: Value Investor
Based on: Benjamin Graham

NetEase, Inc. (NetEase) is a technology company. The Company operates an interactive online community in China and is a provider of Chinese language content and services through its online games, Internet media, e-mail, e-commerce and other businesses. The Company operates through three segments: Online Game Services; Advertising Services, and E-mail, E-commerce and Others. Its online games business primarily focuses on offering personal computer (PC)-client massively multi-player online role-playing games (PC-client MMORPGs), as well as mobile games to the Chinese market. The NetEase Websites provide Internet users with Chinese language online services centered over three core service categories, which include content, community and communication. Its online advertising offerings include banner advertising, direct e-mail, sponsored special events, games, contests and other activities. It offers free and fee-based premium e-mail services to its individual users and corporate users.


SECTOR: PASS

NTES is neither a technology nor financial Company, and therefore this methodology is applicable.


SALES: PASS

The investor must select companies of "adequate size". This includes companies with annual sales greater than $340 million. NTES's sales of $6,513.0 million, based on trailing 12 month sales, pass this test.


CURRENT RATIO: PASS

The current ratio must be greater than or equal to 2. Companies that meet this criterion are typically financially secure and defensive. NTES's current ratio of 2.68 passes the test.


LONG-TERM DEBT IN RELATION TO NET CURRENT ASSETS: PASS

For industrial companies, long-term debt must not exceed net current assets (current assets minus current liabilities). Companies that meet this criterion display one of the attributes of a financially secure organization. The long-term debt for NTES is $0.0 million, while the net current assets are $5,043.5 million. NTES passes this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

Companies must increase their EPS by at least 30% over a ten-year period and EPS must not have been negative for any year within the last 10 years. Companies with this type of growth tend to be financially secure and have proven themselves over time. NTES's EPS growth over that period of 472.2% passes the EPS growth test.


P/E RATIO: FAIL

The Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio, based on the greater of the current PE or the PE using average earnings over the last 3 fiscal years, must be "moderate", which this methodology states is not greater than 15. Stocks with moderate P/Es are more defensive by nature. NTES's P/E of 21.18 (using the current PE) fails this test.


PRICE/BOOK RATIO: FAIL

The Price/Book ratio must also be reasonable. That is, the Price/Book multiplied by P/E cannot be greater than 22. NTES's Price/Book ratio is 6.60, while the P/E is 21.18. NTES fails the Price/Book test.


LEMAITRE VASCULAR INC

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. is a provider of medical devices for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. The Company develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and implants used primarily in the field of vascular surgery. It is engaged in the design, marketing, sales and technical support of medical devices and implants for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease industry segment. The Company's product lines include valvulotomes, balloon catheters, carotid shunts, biologic vascular patches, radiopaque marking tape, anastomotic clips, remote endarterectomy devices, laparoscopic cholecystectomy devices, prosthetic vascular grafts, biologic vascular grafts and powered phlebectomy devices. Its portfolio of peripheral vascular devices consists of brand name products that are used in arteries and veins outside of the heart, including the Expandable LeMaitre Valvulotome, the Pruitt F3 Carotid Shunt, VascuTape Radiopaque Tape and the XenoSure biologic patch.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. LMAT's P/E is 40.86, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 19.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. LMAT's revenue growth is 10.77%, while it's earnings growth rate is 36.41%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates. Therefore, LMAT fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: FAIL

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (15%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (19.2%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For LMAT this criterion has not been met and fails this test.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. LMAT's EPS ($0.23) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. LMAT's EPS for this quarter last year ($0.14) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. LMAT's growth rate of 64.29% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: FAIL

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for LMAT is 18.20%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters which are 54.55%, 0.00% and 33.33%. LMAT does not pass this test, which means that it does not have good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: PASS

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 27.78%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is less than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 64.29%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock passes.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: PASS

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 64.29% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 36.41%. LMAT would therefore pass this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: PASS

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. LMAT, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 0.16, 0.20, 0.23, 0.42 and 0.55, passes this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. LMAT's long-term growth rate of 36.41%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, passes this test.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

A final criterion is that a company must not have a high level of debt. A high level of total debt, due to high interest expenses, can have a very negative effect on earnings if business moderately turns down. If a company does have a high level, an investor may want to avoid this stock altogether. LMAT's Debt/Equity (0.00%) is not considered high relative to its industry (61.30%) and passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For LMAT, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 479, while insiders buying number 171). Despite the fact that insider sells out number insider buys for this company, Zweig considers even one insider buy transaction enough to prevent an insider sell signal, therefore there is not an insider sell signal and the stock passes this criterion.



Watch List

The top scoring stocks not currently in the Hot List portfolio.

Ticker Company Name Current
Score
IPGP IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION 59%
FOXF FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP 51%
KORS MICHAEL KORS HOLDINGS LTD 49%
AGO ASSURED GUARANTY LTD. 46%
ATH ATHENE HOLDING LTD 46%
MAN MANPOWERGROUP INC. 42%
MASI MASIMO CORPORATION 40%
ANET ARISTA NETWORKS INC 38%
CTB COOPER TIRE & RUBBER CO 37%
HAS HASBRO, INC. 36%



Disclaimer

The names of individuals (i.e., the 'gurus') appearing in this report are for identification purposes of his methodology only, as derived by Validea.com from published sources, and are not intended to suggest or imply any affiliation with or endorsement or even agreement with this report personally by such gurus, or any knowledge or approval by such persons of the content of this report. All trademarks, service marks and tradenames appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners, and are likewise used for identification purposes only.

Validea is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or investment advisor either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory authority. Validea is not responsible for trades executed by users of this site based on the information included herein. The information presented on this website does not represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks or any financial instrument nor is it intended as an endorsement of any security or investment. The information on this website is generic by nature and is not personalized to the specific situation of any individual. The user therefore bears complete responsibility for their own investment research and should seek the advice of a qualified investment professional prior to making any investment decisions.

Performance results are based on model portfolios and do not reflect actual trading. Actual performance will vary based on a variety of factors, including market conditions and trading costs. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Individual stocks mentioned throughout this web site may be holdings in the managed portfolios of Validea Capital Management, a separate asset management firm founded by Validea.com founder John Reese. Validea Capital Management, which is a separate legal entity and an SEC registered investment advisory firm, uses, in part, the strategies on the web site to select stocks for its clients.