Economy & Markets

The major stock indexes continue to reach record highs as the economic outlook has proven to be less gloomy than previously feared. The data is pointing to a slowdown but not a recession next year. U.S. job growth for October was strong, and wages are growing at a healthy pace that isn't sparking fears of inflation. The situation on trade with China is still unresolved, but isn't weighing as much on stocks as it did earlier this year. Earnings estimates are coming down, but are still pointing to a small amount of growth for next year. That may be giving more credence to the bull market case than the bears. Stock gains are still being driven by Apple, Google and Amazon, but other sectors are coming into play, including healthcare, retail and semiconductors. Industrials and financials are leading over the S&P 500 over a one-month period. The S&P's forward multiple is 18.65, while it is 18.38 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Some numbers to watch

1. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Wednesday that interest rates will likely remain unchanged as long as growth continues.

2. Non-farm productivity fell at an annual rate of 0.3% in the third quarter, the biggest drop since the last quarter of 2015, according to the Labor Department.

3. The Institute for Supply Management said the service index rose to 54.7% in October, from 52.6% in September, an indication the sector is expanding.

4. U.S. economic output rose at an annual rate of 1.9% in the third quarter, better than expected as consumer spending remained strong.

5. Private payrolls added 125,000 in October, which also beat expectations.

Recommended Reading

So much for glamour stocks. Some of the most highly anticipated IPOs this year have been utterly disappointing. Some 45% of companies in the Russell 3000 posted a profit margin greater than the weighted average of the index, and their stocks rose 2% on average. Glamour stocks are down 4.3% over the last year through August while boring stocks (which are reasonably priced and represent profitable businesses) are up 6.4%, according to Dartmouth Professor Ken French. What's worse, glamour stocks have only beaten the boring ones 25% of the time over rolling six year periods since 1963. Read more about it here , and see below for links to articles and blog posts you may have missed.

Eagle Eyes: Mark Mobius told Financial News he doesn't see a recession coming. There might be a trade-related slowdown, but he sees the Fed continuing to cut interest rates. The next few months, President Trump will be "eagle eyed" on keeping the US economy strong ahead of the next election. Read more

Fool's Game: Trying to predict the next bear market crash is a fool's game, says Mark Spitznagel of Universa Investments, who tells the Wall Street Journal that such bearish calls had a one-third chance of being right over the last century. Investors would be better off not trying to time the market. Read more

Bull Threat: Rob Arnott of Research Associates recently told Financial News that the surge in tech stock valuations was not likely to continue, and that the concentration of assets in a small number of companies was a threat to the bull market. Read more

Spooky Pattern: Mark Hulbert poked holes in the Halloween Indicator, which sees six-months of upside for stocks. After examining data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average going back to the 1800s, he concludes that the seasonal pattern won't help the market over the next six months. Read more

Market Issue: Climate change is the biggest issue facing society and the markets, according to Dan Fuss, a vice chairman at Loomis Sayles, in a recent article in Advisor Perspectives. Read more

Berkshire Cash: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway hasn't been spending down its giant pile of cash. In fact, the cash pile is growing. MarketWatch recently analyzed this and concluded that valuations are the highest they've been since the internet bubble 20 years ago. Read more

Investor Behavior: CFA Institute recently featured a podcast with Clare Flynn Levy, who talked about how behavioral finance affects the investment process. Investors typically are averse to losses but also tend to hold on to once-performing investments longer than they should. Read more

Value Play: Banking, energy and healthcare sectors are showing promise after lagging growth stocks for the last five years, according to a recent article in CNN. The S&P 500 Value Index is up 40% over five years versus the 80% gain for the Growth Index. But Value is up 18.5% this year versus the 20% gain in growth. Read more

Home Bias: American investors have a home bias, according to Morningstar, which says foreign stocks should represent a significant portion of most peoples' portfolios. Investors shouldn't assume that owning large multinational U.S. companies offers enough diversification. Read more

Liberal Arts: Robert Hagstrom, the senior portfolio manager at EquityCompass, says investors can get smarter by using multidisciplinary investment decision models. He calls this "liberal arts investing" and says the idea is catching on. Read more

Genetic Defect: Turing Technology Associates oversaw a study of active management that found they can produce persistent excess return but only devote half their capital to those investments. Alexey Panchekha, Turing's founder, calls this a genetic defect in active management. Read more

Citadel Talks: Crain's recently reported that hedge fund manager Ken Griffin talked to Blackstone Group about one of its funds buying a minority stake in his businesses. The talks ended without a deal, but highlights the struggle even successful fund managers have had over the last few years. Investment from a firm like Blackstone could give Citadel a new pool of clients and help boost its balance sheet. Read more

Value Changes: Sanford Bernstein quant strategy head Inigo Fraser Jenikins says the value strategy needs higher inflation and a new definition that includes intangible assets in the calculation of value, according to a recent article in Bloomberg. Read more

Dump Berkshire: Wedgewood Partners has owned Berkshire Hathaway shares for decades, but David Rolfe, the firm's chief investment officer, recently explained to clients why they quit and sold. He's "fed up" with lackluster investments and missed opportunities. Read more

Value Discipline: Joel Greenblatt defended value investing in a recently WSJ article. But valuing a business is difficult and most people don't have the ability to do it and the discipline to stick with their plan. Investors are impatient and sell at any hint of underperformance. Read more

Fee Generating: Fund companies are offering financial planning services to advisors and investors to generate new revenue as investing dollars continue to channel into low-cost index funds. Morningstar found that advisors have put $35 billion into model portfolios by Vanguard, State Street and others. Read more

Value Pendulum: Over the last 12 months, the pendulum has swung back to favor value stocks and recent data suggests the trend is accelerating, according to a recent article in Forbes. Read more

Peak Tech: GMO's Ben Inker's third quarter letter to investors looks at the potential for a value reversal, according to FTs Alphaville. He tells clients the current market reminds him of 2000, the peak of the dot-com bubble, suggesting reason for cautious optimism for value investors. Read more


The Fallen

As we rebalance the Validea Hot List, 5 stocks leave our portfolio. These include: Criteo Sa (Adr) (CRTO), Skechers Usa Inc (SKX), Monster Beverage Corp (MNST), Medpace Holdings Inc (MEDP) and Mastercard Inc (MA).

The Keepers

5 stocks remain in the portfolio. They are: D. R. Horton Inc (DHI), Copart, Inc. (CPRT), Nk Lukoil Pao (Adr) (LUKOY), Onemain Holdings Inc (OMF) and Pennymac Financial Services Inc (PFSI).

The New Additions

We are adding 5 stocks to the portfolio. These include: Oshkosh Corp (OSK), United Rentals, Inc. (URI), Medifast Inc (MED), Bruker Corporation (BRKR) and Meta Financial Group Inc. (CASH).

Latest Changes

Additions  
OSHKOSH CORP OSK
UNITED RENTALS, INC. URI
MEDIFAST INC MED
BRUKER CORPORATION BRKR
META FINANCIAL GROUP INC. CASH
Deletions  
CRITEO SA (ADR) CRTO
SKECHERS USA INC SKX
MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP MNST
MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC MEDP
MASTERCARD INC MA

Facts about Buybacks

Companies have been buying back their own shares in record volumes in the last couple of years, and that has attracted a fair amount of (negative) scrutiny about the practice. After all, using excess cash to buy back shares rather than investing in a growth market or paying down debt is viewed, rightly or wrongly, as an admission by management that they have no better use for the money than to return it to shareholders. Even Berkshire Hathaway, with a growing cash pile of more than $128 billion has been buying back its own shares. But are buybacks really as bad as everyone says? Validea's Jack Forehand recently looked at some pros and cons of the practice.

There might not be a more controversial topic right now in investing than stock buybacks. The debate over buybacks, which started out as a debate over their investment merits, has morphed into a political one that touches many of the controversial topics of our day such as income inequality and whether Wall Street continues to profit at the expense of average Americans. The negative press that buybacks have received has led some to even conclude that they should be completely banned.

I won't go anywhere near the political portion of the debate here, but I think it is important with a topic like this to take a step back and to understand the facts before we jump to any conclusions. Part of my goal with writing on a regular basis was to use it as an opportunity to learn myself, and this article is an example of that because it will give me an opportunity to sort through what I know about buybacks and to fill in the areas I am not sure about. So here is my attempt to write an article about buybacks without stirring up any controversy. Wish me luck.

What Are Buybacks?

Before we debate the merits of buybacks, it is important to understand what they are. Profitable companies generate excess cash on a regular basis. They have a variety of options for what to do with it. They can reinvest it back in their business. They can just keep it in the bank. They can buy other companies with it. They can pay down debt. They can pay dividends. They can also buy back their own stock.

One of the things that distinguishes the best managers is their ability to properly make these capital allocation decisions. They invest back in their businesses when they expect strong returns from doing so, but they are also willing to return capital to shareholders when they don't.

When managers decide to return capital to shareholders, they have two main options. They can either pay a dividend or they can buy back their stock. If we ran a focus group and asked investors to react positively or negatively to the word "dividend" and the word "buyback," you would see a major divergence. Investors love dividends, but they tend to look at buybacks much more negatively. But much of that is a misunderstanding of what a buyback is.

The excellent Econompic blog did a much better job explaining this than I ever could, but the bottom line is that from an economic perspective, there is no difference between a buyback and a dividend. And as a shareholder of a company, a buyback is a more tax efficient way for it to return capital to you than a dividend is because it is not taxed right away. So, much of the negative press about buybacks has been based on a lack of understanding of what they are. That doesn't mean they can't be used for nefarious purposes (more on that later), but it is important to understand the facts before we get into more detail about the pros and cons.

Buybacks and Stock Returns

If you are an investor seeking to invest in companies that generate the best returns, there is no better thing to look for from a capital allocation perspective than firms that are returning capital to shareholders. Take a look at the chart below from O'Shaughnessy Capital Management.

Source: https://www.osam.com/pdfs/An_Option_to_Improve_Shareholder_Value.pdf

Stocks that bought back shares and paid dividends have performed better than companies that did anything else with their capital.

Or looked at another way, here is the performance difference between firms with high shareholder yield and low shareholder yield (also from OSAM).

Either way you look at it, investing in firms that buy back their stock has been a very good idea. Investing in firms that do high conviction buybacks at low valuations has been an even better one.

The Downsides of Buybacks

Again, I am only going to look at this issue from an investor's perspective, so I am not going to get into the arguments about the impact that buybacks have on society. But there are some downsides to buybacks for investors. There are also many perceived downsides that are often mentioned in the media, but that don't hold up to scrutiny.

The biggest downside of buybacks is one that Ben Hunt of the Epsilon Theory blog discussed in his excellent recent post . To summarize, if the management of a company issues themselves stock options at discounted prices and then uses a buyback to purchase the shares from themselves at a big profit, this is certainly not the type of buyback I would want to see as an investor. How widespread this behavior has become is subject to debate, but there is no question that some of this goes on and it isn't a positive for shareholders. Not all buybacks are created equal and it is important to look at the details before assuming that a company buying back its stock is a good thing.

There are also other commonly discussed downsides to buybacks that are more perceived than real. For example, the data doesn't back up the assertion that most of the growth in earnings per share for the market since the financial crisis has come from a reduction in shares due to buybacks. It also doesn't support the assertion that firms are bypassing more profitable investment opportunities to buy back their shares. article by Cliff Asness of AQR does the best job of any I have seen of dispelling some of major myths about buybacks using data. Or if you don't want to read the full article, Alpha Architect did an excellent job of summarizing it .

Separating Investing From Politics

We all have our own political views that we bring to the table. And it can be difficult not to evaluate everything we see in the world through that lens. But one of our goals with this blog is to try to check our personal views at the door and to evaluate things based on their merits for long-term investors. When looked at on that basis, buybacks have been a strong positive for investors. As I said before, not all buybacks are created equal and it is important to look at the details, but the evidence is very compelling that as a whole, firms that buy back their stock have generated solid long-term performance.


Portfolio Holdings
Ticker Date Added Return
MED 11/15/2019 TBD
LUKOY 4/5/2019 5.6%
CPRT 9/20/2019 3.9%
PFSI 8/23/2019 11.9%
OMF 8/23/2019 8.5%
DHI 8/23/2019 10.3%
BRKR 11/15/2019 TBD
CASH 11/15/2019 TBD
OSK 11/15/2019 TBD
URI 11/15/2019 TBD


Guru Analysis
Disclaimer: The analysis is from Validea's selection and interpretation of content from the guru's book or published writings, and is not from nor endorsed by the guru. See Full Disclaimer

MED  |   LUKOY  |   CPRT  |   PFSI  |   OMF  |   DHI  |   BRKR  |   CASH  |   OSK  |   URI  |  

MEDIFAST INC

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Medifast, Inc. produces, distributes and sells weight loss, weight management, and healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutritional products. The Company's product lines include weight loss, weight management, and healthy living meal replacements, snacks, hydration products, and vitamins. Its business units include Optavia, Medifast Direct, Franchise Medifast Weight Control Centers (MWCC) and Medifast Wholesale. Optavia is a personal coaching division of the Company that consists of Optavia Coaches, who provides coaching and support to clients utilizing the Optavia platform. Medifast Direct is its direct-to-consumer business unit that allows customers to order Medifast products directly through its Website or its in-house call center. The MWCC business unit sells product through franchise and reseller locations, which offers structured programs and a team of professionals to help customers achieve weight-loss and weight-management success at center locations.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider MED a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: PASS

The investor should examine the P/E (12.62) relative to the growth rate (29.80%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for MED (0.42) is very favorable.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: NEUTRAL

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth rate high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. MED, whose sales are $688.9 million, is not considered large enough to apply the P/E ratio analysis. However, an investor can analyze the P/E ratio relative to the EPS growth rate.


INVENTORY TO SALES: PASS

When inventories increase faster than sales, it is a red flag. However an increase of up to 5% is considered bearable if all other ratios appear attractive. Inventory to sales for MED was 6.41% last year, while for this year it is 7.76%. Since inventory has been rising, this methodology would not look favorably at the stock but would not completely eliminate it from consideration as the inventory increase (1.35%) is below 5%.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for MED is 29.8%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is acceptable.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

This methodology would consider the Debt/Equity ratio for MED (0.00%) to be wonderfully low (equity is at least ten times debt). This ratio is one quick way to determine the financial strength of the company.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for MED (3.54%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for MED (10.99%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NK LUKOIL PAO (ADR)

Strategy: Growth/Value Investor
Based on: James P. O'Shaughnessy

NK Lukoil PAO is an energy company. The primary activities of LUKOIL and its subsidiaries are oil exploration, production, refining, marketing and distribution. Its segments include Exploration and Production; Refining, Marketing and Distribution, and Corporate and other. The Exploration and Production segment includes its exploration, development and production operations related to crude oil and gas. These activities are located within Russia, with additional activities in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, the Middle East, Northern and Western Africa, Norway, Romania and Mexico. The Refining, Marketing and Distribution segment includes refining, petrochemical and transport operations, marketing and trading of crude oil, natural gas and refined products, generation, transportation and sales of electricity, heat and related services. The Corporate and other segment includes operations related to finance activities, production of diamonds and certain other activities.


MARKET CAP: PASS

The Cornerstone Value Strategy looks for large, well known companies whose market cap is greater than $1 billion. These companies exhibit solid and stable earnings. LUKOY's market cap of $67,595 million passes this test.


CASH FLOW PER SHARE: PASS

The second criterion requires that the company exhibit strong cash flows. Companies with strong cash flow are typically the value oriented investments that this strategy looks for. The company's cash flow per share must be greater than the mean of the market cash flow per share ($1.90). LUKOY's cash flow per share of $22.84 passes this test.


SHARES OUTSTANDING: PASS

This particular strategy looks for companies whose total number of outstanding shares are in excess of the market average (596 million shares). These are the more well known and highly traded companies. LUKOY, who has 674 million shares outstanding, passes this test.


TRAILING 12 MONTH SALES: PASS

A company's trailing 12 month sales ($130,185 million) are required to be 1.5 times greater than the mean of the market's trailing 12 month sales ($24,544 million). LUKOY passes this test.


DIVIDEND: PASS

The final step in the Cornerstone Value strategy is to select the 50 companies from the market leaders group (those that have passed the previous four criteria) that have the highest dividend yield. LUKOY, with a dividend yield of 4.10%, is one of the 50 companies that satisfy this last criterion.


COPART, INC.

Strategy: Patient Investor
Based on: Warren Buffett

Copart, Inc. (Copart) is a provider of online auctions and vehicle remarketing services in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain, Brazil, Ireland, Spain and India. The Company also provides vehicle remarketing services in Germany. The Company operates through two segments: United States and International. The Company provides vehicle sellers with a range of services to process and sell vehicles primarily over the Internet through its virtual bidding third generation Internet auction-style sales technology (VB3). The Company's service offerings include Online Seller Access, Salvage Estimation Services, Estimating Services, End-Of-Life Vehicle Processing, Virtual Insured Exchange (VIX), Transportation Services, Vehicle Inspection Stations, On-Demand Reporting, Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) Processing, Flexible Vehicle Processing Programs, Buy It Now, Member Network, Sales Process, Copart Dealer Services, CashForCars.com and U-Pull-It.

STAGE 1: "Is this a Buffett type company?"

A bedrock principle for Buffett is that his type of company has a "durable competitive advantage" as compared to being a "price competitive" or "commodity" type of business. Companies with a "durable competitive advantage" are more likely to be found in these sub-industries: Brand Name Fast Food Restaurants, Brand Name Beverages, Brand Name Foods, Brand Name Toiletries and Household Products, Brand Name Clothing, Brand Name Prescription Drugs, Advertising, Advertising Agencies, TV, Newspapers, Magazines, Direct Mail, Repetitive Services for Businesses, Low Cost Producers of Insurance, furniture, or Low Cost Retailers. While you should be easily able to explain where the company's pricing power comes from (i.e. a strong regional brand image, a business tollgate, its main products are #1 or # 2 in its field and has been on the market for years and hasn't changed at all, a consumer or business ends up buying the same product many times in a year, etc. or having the lowest production cost among its competition), there are certain figures that one can look at that can qualify the company as having a durable competitive advantage.


LOOK FOR EARNINGS PREDICTABILITY: PASS

Buffett likes companies to have solid, stable earnings that are continually expanding. This allows him to accurately predict future earnings. Annual earnings per share from earliest to most recent were 0.45, 0.54, 0.70, 0.69, 0.68, 0.84, 1.11, 1.66, 1.76, 2.46. Buffett would consider CPRT's earnings predictable, although earnings have declined 2 time(s) in the past seven years, with the most recent decline 6 years ago. The dips have totaled 2.9%. CPRT's long term historical EPS growth rate is 19.6%, based on the 10 year average EPS growth rate, and it is expected to grow earnings 9.0% per year in the future, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate. For the purposes of our analysis, we will use the more conservative of the two EPS growth numbers.


LOOK AT THE ABILITY TO PAY OFF DEBT PASS

Buffett likes companies that are conservatively financed. Nonetheless, he has invested in companies with large financing divisions and in firms with rather high levels of debt. CPRT has a debt of 400.1 million and earnings of 587.9 million, which could be used to pay off the debt in less than two years, which is considered exceptional.


LOOK FOR CONSISTENTLY HIGHER THAN AVERAGE RETURN ON EQUITY: PASS

Buffett likes companies with above average return on equity of at least 15% or better, as this is an indicator that the company has a durable competitive advantage. US corporations have, on average, returned about 12% on equity over the last 30 years. The average ROE for CPRT, over the last ten years, is 25.6%, which is high enough to pass. It is not enough that the average be at least 15%. For each of the last 10 years, with the possible exception of the last fiscal year, the ROE must be at least 10% for Buffett to feel comfortable that the ROE is consistent. In addition, the average ROE over the last 3 years must also exceed 15%. The ROE for the last 10 years, from earliest to latest, is 13.8%, 25.8%, 31.1%, 22.9%, 17.1%, 20.8%, 31.5%, 34.9%, 26.1%, 31.9%, and the average ROE over the last 3 years is 30.9%, thus passing this criterion.


LOOK FOR CONSISTENTLY HIGHER THAN AVERAGE RETURN ON TOTAL CAPITAL: PASS

Because some companies can be financed with debt that is many times their equity, they can show a consistently high ROE, yet still be in unattractive price competitive businesses. To screen this out, for non-financial companies Buffett also requires that the average Return On Total Capital (ROTC) be at least 12% and consistent. In addition, the average ROTC over the last 3 years must also exceed 12%. Return On Total Capital is defined as the net earnings of the business divided by the total capital in the business, both equity and debt. The average ROTC for CPRT, over the last ten years, is 18.0% and the average ROTC over the past 3 years is 23.4%, which is high enough to pass. It is not enough that the average be at least 12%. For each of the last 10 years, with the possible exception of the last fiscal year, the ROTC must be at least 9% for Buffett to feel comfortable that the ROTC is consistent. The ROTC for the last 10 years, from earliest to latest, is 13.8%, 16.3%, 18.8%, 16.5%, 14.0%, 12.9%, 18.2%, 23.3%, 20.8%, 26.0%, thus passing this criterion.


LOOK AT CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: PASS

Buffett likes companies that do not have major capital expenditures. That is, he looks for companies that do not need to spend a ton of money on major upgrades of plant and equipment or on research and development to stay competitive. CPRT's free cash flow per share of $1.13 is positive, indicating that the company is generating more cash than it is consuming. This is a favorable sign, and so the company passes this criterion.


LOOK AT MANAGEMENT'S USE OF RETAINED EARNINGS: PASS

Buffett likes to see if management has spent retained earnings in a way that benefits shareholders. To figure this out, Buffett takes the total amount of retained earnings over the previous ten years of $10.89 and compares it to the gain in EPS over the same period of $2.01. CPRT's management has proven it can earn shareholders a 18.5% return on the earnings they kept. This return is more than acceptable to Buffett. Essentially, management is doing a great job putting the retained earnings to work.


HAS THE COMPANY BEEN BUYING BACK SHARES: BONUS PASS

Buffett likes to see falling shares outstanding, which indicates that the company has been repurchasing shares. This indicates that management has been using excess capital to increase shareholder value. CPRT's shares outstanding have fallen over the past five years from 240,309,998 to 238,000,000, thus passing this criterion. This is a bonus criterion and will not adversely affect the ability of a stock to pass the strategy as a whole if it is failed.

The preceding concludes Buffett's qualitative analysis. If and when he gets positive responses to all the above criteria, he would then proceed with a price analysis. The price analysis will determine whether or not the stock should be bought. The following is how he would evaluate CPRT quantitatively.

STAGE 2: "Should I buy at this price?" Although a firm may be a Buffett type company, he won't invest in it unless he can get a favorable price that allows him a great long term return.


CALCULATE THE INITIAL RATE OF RETURN: [No Pass/Fail]

Buffett compares his type of stocks to bonds, and likes to see what a company's initial rate of return is. To calculate the initial rate of return, take the trailing 12-month EPS of $2.47 and divide it by the current market price of $85.82. An investor, purchasing CPRT, could expect to receive a 2.88% initial rate of return. Furthermore, he or she could expect the rate to increase 9.0% per year, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate, as this is how fast earnings are growing.


COMPARE THE INITIAL RATE OF RETURN WITH THE LONG-TERM TREASURY YIELD: PASS

Buffett favors companies in which the initial rate of return is around the long-term treasury yield. Nonetheless, he has invested in companies with low initial rates of return, as long as the yield is expected to expand rapidly. Currently, the long-term treasury yield is about 2.00%. Compare this with CPRT's initial yield of 2.88%, which will expand at an annual rate of 9.0%, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate. The company is the better choice, as the initial rate of return is close to or above the long term bond yield and is expanding.


CALCULATE THE FUTURE EPS: [No Pass/Fail]

CPRT currently has a book value of $7.74. It is safe to say that if CPRT can preserve its average rate of return on equity of 25.6% and continues to retain 100.00% of its earnings, it will be able to sustain an earnings growth rate of 25.6% and it will have a book value of $75.49 in ten years. If it can still earn 25.6% on equity in ten years, then expected EPS will be $19.31.


CALCULATE THE FUTURE STOCK PRICE BASED ON THE AVERAGE ROE METHOD: [No Pass/Fail]

Now take the expected future EPS of $19.31 and multiply them by the lower of the 5 year average P/E ratio or current P/E ratio (34.7) (5 year average P/E in this case), which is 26.8 and you get CPRT's projected future stock price of $516.90.


CALCULATE THE EXPECTED RATE OF RETURN BASED ON THE AVERAGE ROE METHOD: [No Pass/Fail]

Now add in the total expected dividend pool to be paid over the next ten years, which is $0.00. This gives you a total dollar amount of $516.90. These numbers indicate that one could expect to make a 19.7% average annual return on CPRT's stock at the present time. Buffett would consider this a great return.


CALCULATE THE EXPECTED FUTURE STOCK PRICE BASED ON AVERAGE EPS GROWTH: [No Pass/Fail]

If you take the EPS growth of 9.0%, based on the analysts' consensus estimated long term growth rate, you can project EPS in ten years to be $5.85. Now multiply EPS in 10 years by the lower of the 5 year average P/E ratio or current P/E ratio (34.7) (5 year average P/E in this case), which is 26.8. This equals the future stock price of $156.53. Add in the total expected dividend pool of $0.00 to get a total dollar amount of $156.53.


CALCULATE THE EXPECTED RETURN USING THE AVERAGE EPS GROWTH METHOD: [No Pass/Fail]

Now you can figure out your expected return based on a current price of $85.82 and the future expected stock price, including the dividend pool, of $156.53. If you were to invest in CPRT at this time, you could expect a 6.19% average annual return on your money. Buffett likes to see a 15% return, and would even go down to 12%.


LOOK AT THE RANGE OF EXPECTED RATE OF RETURN: PASS

Based on the two different methods, you could expect an annual compounding rate of return somewhere between 6.2% and 19.7%. To pinpoint the average return a little better, we have taken an average of the two different methods. Investors could expect an average return of 12.9% on CPRT stock for the next ten years, based on the current fundamentals. Buffett likes to see a 15% return, but nonetheless would accept this return, thus passing the criterion.


PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES INC

Strategy: Small-Cap Growth Investor
Based on: Motley Fool

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is a specialty financial services firm. The Company conducts business in three segments: production, servicing (together, production and servicing comprise its mortgage banking activities) and investment management. Production segment performs mortgage loan origination, acquisition and sale activities. Servicing segment performs mortgage loan servicing for its own account and for others, including for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). Investment management segment represents its investment management activities, which include the activities associated with investment asset acquisitions and dispositions, such as sourcing, due diligence, negotiation and settlement; managing correspondent production activities for PMT; and managing the acquired investments for PMT. Its primary subsidiaries are: PNMAC Capital Management, LLC, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and PNMAC Opportunity Fund Associates, LLC.


PROFIT MARGIN: PASS

This methodology seeks companies with a minimum trailing 12 month after tax profit margin of 7%. The companies that pass this criterion have strong positions within their respective industries and offer greater shareholder returns. A true test of the quality of a company is that they can sustain this margin. PFSI's profit margin of 15.06% passes this test.


RELATIVE STRENGTH: PASS

The investor must look at the relative strength of the company in question. Companies whose relative strength is 90 or above (that is, the company outperforms 90% or more of the market for the past year), are considered attractive. Companies whose price has been rising much quicker than the market tend to keep rising. PFSI, with a relative strength of 91, satisfies this test.


COMPARE SALES AND EPS GROWTH TO THE SAME PERIOD LAST YEAR: PASS

Companies must demonstrate both revenue and net income growth of at least 25% as compared to the prior year. These growth rates give you the dynamic companies that you are looking for. These rates for PFSI (169.64% for EPS, and 83.89% for Sales) are good enough to pass.


INSIDER HOLDINGS: PASS

PFSI's insiders should own at least 10% (they own 41.14% ) of the company's outstanding shares which is extremely attractive since the minimum requirement is 10%. A high percentage indicates that the insiders are confident that the company will do well.


CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS: PASS

A positive cash flow is typically used for internal expansion, acquisitions, dividend payments, etc. A company that generates rather than consumes cash is in much better shape to fund such activities on their own, rather than needing to borrow funds to do so. PFSI's free cash flow of $8.60 per share passes this test.


PROFIT MARGIN CONSISTENCY: PASS

PFSI's profit margin has been consistent or even increasing over the past three years (Current year: 6.42%, Last year: 7.24%, Two years ago: 4.85%), passing the requirement. It is a sign of good management and a healthy and competitive enterprise.


R&D AS A PERCENTAGE OF SALES: NEUTRAL

This criterion is not critically important for companies that are not high-tech or medical stocks because they are not as R&D dependant as companies within those sectors. Not much emphasis should be placed on this test in PFSI's case.


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: FAIL

PFSI does not have a sufficiently large amount of cash, $155.29 million, on hand relative to its size. Although this criteria does not apply to companies of this size, we defined anything greater than $500 million in cash as having 'a lot of cash' to allow analysis of these companies. PFSI will have more of a difficult time paying off debt (if it has any) or acquiring other companies than a company that passes this criterion.


ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE TO SALES: PASS

This methodology wants to make sure that a company's accounts receivable do not get significantly out of line with sales. It's a warning sign if a company's accounts receivable relative to sales increases significantly when compared to the previous year. Up to a 30% increase is allowed, but no more. Accounts Receivable to Sales for PFSI was 1.95% last year, while for this year it is 2.45%. Although the AR to sales is rising, it is below the max 30% that is allowed. The investor can still consider the stock if all other criteria appear very attractive.


"THE FOOL RATIO" (P/E TO GROWTH): PASS

The "Fool Ratio" is an extremely important aspect of this analysis. If the company has attractive fundamentals and its Fool Ratio is 0.5 or less (PFSI's is 0.19), the shares are looked upon favorably. These high quality companies can often wind up as the biggest winners. PFSI passes this test.

The following criteria for PFSI are less important which means you would place less emphasis on them when making your investment decision using this strategy:

AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: PASS

PFSI has not been significantly increasing the number of shares outstanding within recent years which is a good sign. PFSI currently has 80.0 million shares outstanding. This means the company is not taking any measures, with regards to the number of shares, that will dilute or devalue the stock.


SALES: FAIL

Companies with sales less than $500 million should be chosen. It is among these small-cap stocks that investors can find "an uncut gem", ones that institutions won't be able to buy yet. PFSI's sales of $1,946.9 million based on trailing 12 month sales, are too high and would therefore fail the test. It is companies with $500 million or less in sales that are most likely to double or triple in size in the next few years.


DAILY DOLLAR VOLUME: PASS

PFSI passes the Daily Dollar Volume (DDV of $13.7 million) test. It is required that this number be less than $25 million because these are the stocks that remain relatively undiscovered by institutions. "You'll be scoring touchdowns against the big guys on your turf."


PRICE: PASS

This is a very insignificant criterion for this methodology. But basically, low prices are chosen because "small numbers multiply more rapidly than large ones" and the potential for big returns expands. PFSI with a price of $31.89 passes the price test, even though it doesn't fall in the preferred range. The price should be above $7 in order to eliminate penny stocks and below $20 since most stocks in this price range are undiscovered by the institutions.


INCOME TAX PERCENTAGE: FAIL

PFSI's income tax paid expressed as a percentage of pretax income either this year (8.69%) or last year (11.34%) is below 20% which is cause for concern. Because the tax rate is below 20% this could mean that the earnings that were reported are unrealistically inflated due to the lower level of income tax paid. However, we have utilized a sophisticated formula so that the appropriate figures reflect a 'normal' tax rate (35%).


ONEMAIN HOLDINGS INC

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

OneMain Holdings, Inc. is a financial services holding company. The Company is a consumer finance company, which is engaged in providing personal loan products; credit and non-credit insurance, and service loans owned by it and service or subservice loans owned by third-parties. The Company's segments include Consumer and Insurance; Acquisitions and Servicing; Real Estate, and Other. It is engaged in pursuing strategic acquisitions and dispositions of assets and businesses, including loan portfolios or other financial assets. The Company originates and services personal loans (secured and unsecured) through two business divisions: branch operations and centralized operations. As of December 31, 2016, its combined branch operations included over 1,800 branch offices in 44 states. It offers optional credit insurance products to its customers, including credit life insurance, credit disability insurance, credit involuntary unemployment insurance and collateral protection insurance.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. OMF's P/E is 7.40, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 20.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. OMF's revenue growth is 18.44%, while it's earnings growth rate is 33.23%, based on the average of the 3 and 5 year historical eps growth rates using the current fiscal year eps estimate. Therefore, OMF fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: PASS

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (13.6%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (11%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For OMF this criterion has been met.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. OMF's EPS ($1.82) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. OMF's EPS for this quarter last year ($1.09) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. OMF's growth rate of 66.97% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: PASS

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for OMF is 16.61%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters, which are 39.77%, 23.08%, and 2,740.00%. OMF passes this test, which means that it has good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: PASS

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 104.89%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is greater than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 66.97%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock fails, with one exception: if the growth rate in earnings between the current quarter and the same quarter one year ago is greater than 30%, then the stock would pass. The growth rate over this period for OMF is 67.0%, and it would therefore pass this test.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: PASS

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 66.97% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 33.23%. OMF would therefore pass this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: FAIL

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. OMF, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 4.38, -1.72, 1.59, 1.95, and 3.29, fails this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. OMF's long-term growth rate of 33.23%, based on the average of the 3 and 5 year historical eps growth rates using the current fiscal year eps estimate, passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For OMF, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 0, while insiders buying number 2). Despite the lack of an insider buy signal, there also is not an insider sell signal, so the stock passes this criterion.


D. R. HORTON INC

Strategy: Small-Cap Growth Investor
Based on: Motley Fool

D.R. Horton, Inc. is a homebuilding company. The Company has operations in 84 markets in 29 states across the United States. The Company's segments include its 44 homebuilding divisions, its financial services operations and its other business activities. In the homebuilding segment, the Company builds and sells single-family detached homes and attached homes, such as town homes, duplexes, triplexes and condominiums. The Company's 44 homebuilding divisions are aggregated into six segments: East Region, South Central Region, Midwest Region, West Region, Southwest Region and Southeast Region. In the financial services segment, the Company sells mortgages and collects fees for title insurance agency and closing services. The Company has subsidiaries that conduct insurance-related operations; construct and own income-producing rental properties; own non-residential real estate, including ranch land and improvements, and own and operate oil and gas-related assets.


PROFIT MARGIN: PASS

This methodology seeks companies with a minimum trailing 12 month after tax profit margin of 7%. The companies that pass this criterion have strong positions within their respective industries and offer greater shareholder returns. A true test of the quality of a company is that they can sustain this margin. DHI's profit margin of 9.20% passes this test.


RELATIVE STRENGTH: PASS

The investor must look at the relative strength of the company in question. Companies whose relative strength is 90 or above (that is, the company outperforms 90% or more of the market for the past year), are considered attractive. Companies whose price has been rising much quicker than the market tend to keep rising. DHI, with a relative strength of 91, satisfies this test.


COMPARE SALES AND EPS GROWTH TO THE SAME PERIOD LAST YEAR: FAIL

Companies must demonstrate both revenue and net income growth of at least 25% as compared to the prior year. These growth rates give you the dynamic companies that you are looking for. These rates for DHI (10.66% for EPS, and 11.85% for Sales) are not good enough to pass.


INSIDER HOLDINGS: FAIL

DHI's insiders should own at least 10% (they own 8.24%) of the company's outstanding shares. This does not satisfy the minimum requirement, and companies that do not pass this criteria are less attractive.


CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS: PASS

A positive cash flow is typically used for internal expansion, acquisitions, dividend payments, etc. A company that generates rather than consumes cash is in much better shape to fund such activities on their own, rather than needing to borrow funds to do so. DHI's free cash flow of $1.18 per share passes this test.


PROFIT MARGIN CONSISTENCY: PASS

DHI's profit margin has been consistent or even increasing over the past three years (Current year: 9.09%, Last year: 7.37%, Two years ago: 7.29%), passing the requirement. It is a sign of good management and a healthy and competitive enterprise.


R&D AS A PERCENTAGE OF SALES: NEUTRAL

This criterion is not critically important for companies that are not high-tech or medical stocks because they are not as R&D dependant as companies within those sectors. Not much emphasis should be placed on this test in DHI's case.


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: PASS

DHI has a large amount of cash $1,494.3 million on hand. Although this criteria does not apply to companies of this size, we define anything greater than $500 million in cash as having 'a lot of cash' to allow analysis of these companies. A company like DHI has the ability to pay off debt (if it has any) or acquire other companies. Most importantly, good operations generate cash.


INVENTORY TO SALES: PASS

This methodology strongly believes that companies, especially small ones, should have tight control over inventory. It's a warning sign if a company's inventory relative to sales increases significantly when compared to the previous year. Up to a 30% increase is allowed, but no more. Inventory to Sales for DHI was 65.55% last year, while for this year it is 64.69%. Since the inventory to sales is decreasing by -0.86% the stock passes this criterion.


ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE TO SALES: PASS

This methodology wants to make sure that a company's accounts receivable do not get significantly out of line with sales. It's a warning sign if a company's accounts receivable relative to sales increases significantly when compared to the previous year. Up to a 30% increase is allowed, but no more. Accounts Receivable to Sales for DHI was 0.95% last year, while for this year it is 0.85%. Since the AR to sales is decreasing by -0.11% the stock passes this criterion.


LONG TERM DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: FAIL

DHI's trailing twelve-month Debt/Equity ratio (33.92%) is too high, according to this methodology. You can find other more superior companies that do not have to borrow money in order to grow.


"THE FOOL RATIO" (P/E TO GROWTH): PASS

The "Fool Ratio" is an extremely important aspect of this analysis. If the company has attractive fundamentals and its Fool Ratio is 0.5 or less (DHI's is 0.46), the shares are looked upon favorably. These high quality companies can often wind up as the biggest winners. DHI passes this test.

The following criteria for DHI are less important which means you would place less emphasis on them when making your investment decision using this strategy:

AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: FAIL

DHI has either issued a significant amount of new shares over the past year or has been issuing more and more shares over the past five years. DHI currently has 375.0 million shares outstanding. Neither of these are a good sign. Generally when a small-cap company issues more stock, the existing stock becomes devalued by the market, and hence diluted.


SALES: FAIL

Companies with sales less than $500 million should be chosen. It is among these small-cap stocks that investors can find "an uncut gem", ones that institutions won't be able to buy yet. DHI's sales of $17,592.9 million based on trailing 12 month sales, are too high and would therefore fail the test. It is companies with $500 million or less in sales that are most likely to double or triple in size in the next few years.


DAILY DOLLAR VOLUME: FAIL

DHI does not pass the Daily Dollar Volume (DDV of $247.1 million) test. It exceeds the maximum requirement of $25 million. Stocks that fail the test are too liquid for a small individual investor and many institutions have already discovered it.


PRICE: PASS

This is a very insignificant criterion for this methodology. But basically, low prices are chosen because "small numbers multiply more rapidly than large ones" and the potential for big returns expands. DHI with a price of $54.26 passes the price test, even though it doesn't fall in the preferred range. The price should be above $7 in order to eliminate penny stocks and below $20 since most stocks in this price range are undiscovered by the institutions.


INCOME TAX PERCENTAGE: PASS

DHI's income tax paid expressed as a percentage of pretax income this year was (23.74%) and last year (35.19%) are greater than 20% which is an acceptable level. If the tax rate is below 20% this could mean that the earnings that were reported were unrealistically inflated due to the lower level of income tax paid. This is a concern.


BRUKER CORPORATION

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

Bruker Corporation designs and manufactures scientific instruments, and analytical and diagnostic solutions. Its segments include the Bruker BioSpin Group; the Bruker Chemicals, Applied Markets, Life Science, In-Vitro Diagnostics, Detection (CALID) Group; the Bruker Nano Group, and the Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST) Segment. The Bruker BioSpin Group segment designs, manufactures and distributes enabling life science tools. The Bruker CALID segment designs, manufactures and distributes life science mass spectrometry instruments that can be integrated and used along with other sample preparation or chromatography instruments, as well as chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive detection products. The Bruker Nano segment designs, manufactures and distributes spectroscopy and microscopy instruments. The BEST segment develops and manufactures superconducting and non-superconducting materials and devices. It also focuses on nanomechanical testing instruments.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. BRKR's P/E is 37.32, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 20.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. BRKR's revenue growth is 2.34%, while it's earnings growth rate is 25.93%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates. Therefore, BRKR fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: PASS

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (11.7%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (10.5%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For BRKR this criterion has been met.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. BRKR's EPS ($0.39) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. BRKR's EPS for this quarter last year ($0.28) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. BRKR's growth rate of 39.29% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: PASS

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for BRKR is 12.97%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters, which are 19.05%, 17.65%, and 15.00%. BRKR passes this test, which means that it has good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: PASS

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 17.72%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is less than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 39.29%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock passes.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: PASS

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 39.29% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 25.93%. BRKR would therefore pass this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: FAIL

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. BRKR, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 0.34, 0.60, 0.95, 0.93, and 1.14, fails this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. BRKR's long-term growth rate of 25.93%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, passes this test.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

A final criterion is that a company must not have a high level of debt. A high level of total debt, due to high interest expenses, can have a very negative effect on earnings if business moderately turns down. If a company does have a high level, an investor may want to avoid this stock altogether. BRKR's Debt/Equity (61.38%) is not considered high relative to its industry (203.13%) and passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For BRKR, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 6, while insiders buying number 9). Despite the lack of an insider buy signal, there also is not an insider sell signal, so the stock passes this criterion.


META FINANCIAL GROUP INC.

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Meta Financial Group, Inc. is a unitary savings and loan holding company. The Company operates through its banking subsidiary, MetaBank (the Bank). Its segments include Payments, Banking, and Corporate Services/Other. MetaBank is both a community-oriented financial institution offering a range of financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves and a payments company providing services on a nationwide basis. It operates in both the banking and payments industries through MetaBank, its retail banking operation; Meta Payment Systems (MPS), its electronic payments division; AFS/IBEX Financial Services Inc. (AFS/IBEX), its insurance premium financing division, and Refund Advantage, EPS Financial, LLC (EPS) Financial and Specialty Consumer Services, its tax-related financial solutions divisions. The Company, through its Meta Commercial Finance Division, which includes its state-chartered bank subsidiary, Crestmark Bank, provides business-to-business commercial financing.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider CASH a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: PASS

The investor should examine the P/E (13.45) relative to the growth rate (25.74%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for CASH (0.52) makes it favorable.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: NEUTRAL

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth rate high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. CASH, whose sales are $325.7 million, is not considered large enough to apply the P/E ratio analysis. However, an investor can analyze the P/E ratio relative to the EPS growth rate.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for CASH is 25.7%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is acceptable.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: NEUTRAL

CASH is a financial company so debt to equity rules are not applied to determine the company's financial soundness.


EQUITY/ASSETS RATIO: PASS

This methodology uses the Equity/Assets Ratio as a way to determine a financial intermediary's health, as it is a better measure than the Debt/Equity Ratio. CASH's Equity/Assets ratio (14.00%) is extremely healthy and above the minimum 5% this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


RETURN ON ASSETS: PASS

This methodology uses Return on Assets as a way to measure a financial intermediary's profitability. CASH's ROA (1.69%) is above the minimum 1% that this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


OSHKOSH CORP

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

Oshkosh Corp is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of a broad range of engineered specialty vehicles and vehicle bodies. The Company operates through four segments: access equipment, defense, fire & emergency and commercial. Access equipment segment designs and manufactures aerial work platforms and telehandlers used in a wide variety of construction, industrial, institutional and general maintenance applications and also manufactures towing and recovery equipment in the United States. Defense segment manufactures heavy, medium, and light tactical wheeled vehicles. Fire & emergency segment designs and manufactures fire apparatus assembled on custom chassis, aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles to domestic and international airports and broadcast and communication vehicles. Commercial segment designs and manufactures front- and rear-discharge concrete mixers and portable and stationary concrete batch plants, refuse collection vehicles and field service vehicles.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. OSK's P/E is 10.92, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 20.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. OSK's revenue growth is 7.51%, while it's earnings growth rate is 29.48%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates. Therefore, OSK fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: FAIL

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (6.7%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (10%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For OSK this criterion has not been met and fails this test.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. OSK's EPS ($2.17) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. OSK's EPS for this quarter last year ($2.02) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. OSK's growth rate of 7.43% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: PASS

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for OSK is 14.74%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters, which are 143.94%, 23.13%, and 34.16%. OSK passes this test, which means that it has good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: FAIL

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 47.71%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is greater than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 7.43%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock fails, with one exception: if the growth rate in earnings between the current quarter and the same quarter one year ago is greater than 30%, then the stock would pass. The growth rate over this period for OSK is 7.4%, and it would therefore fail this test.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: FAIL

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 7.43% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 29.48%. Since this is not the case OSK would therefore fail this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: PASS

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. OSK, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 2.90, 2.91, 3.77, 6.15 and 8.21, passes this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. OSK's long-term growth rate of 29.48%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, passes this test.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

A final criterion is that a company must not have a high level of debt. A high level of total debt, due to high interest expenses, can have a very negative effect on earnings if business moderately turns down. If a company does have a high level, an investor may want to avoid this stock altogether. OSK's Debt/Equity (31.50%) is not considered high relative to its industry (174.40%) and passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For OSK, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 4, while insiders buying number 31). Despite the lack of an insider buy signal, there also is not an insider sell signal, so the stock passes this criterion.


UNITED RENTALS, INC.

Strategy: Growth/Value Investor
Based on: James P. O'Shaughnessy

United Rentals, Inc. is a holding company. The Company is an equipment rental company, which operates throughout the United States and Canada. It operates through two segments: general rentals, and trench, power and pump. The general rentals segment includes the rental of construction, aerial, industrial and homeowner equipment and related services and activities. The trench, power and pump segment includes the rental of specialty construction products and related services. Its general rentals segment includes the rental of general construction and industrial equipment, such as backhoes, skid-steer loaders, forklifts and material handling equipment; aerial work platforms, such as boom lifts and scissor lifts, and general tools and light equipment, such as pressure washers, water pumps and power tools. As of October 17, 2018, it operated 1075 rental locations. It conducts its operations through its subsidiary, United Rentals (North America), Inc. (URNA) and subsidiaries of URNA.


MARKET CAP: PASS

The first requirement of the Cornerstone Growth Strategy is that the company has a market capitalization of at least $150 million. This will screen out the companies that are too illiquid for most investors, but still include a small growth company. URI, with a market cap of $11,448 million, passes this criterion.


EARNINGS PER SHARE PERSISTENCE: PASS

The Cornerstone Growth methodology looks for companies that show persistent earnings growth without regard to magnitude. To fulfill this requirement, a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. URI, whose annual EPS before extraordinary items for the last 5 years (from earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 5.14, 6.07, 6.45, 7.68 and 13.19, passes this test.


PRICE/SALES RATIO: PASS

The Price/Sales ratio should be below 1.5. This value criterion, coupled with the growth criterion, identify growth stocks that are still cheap to buy. URI's Price/Sales ratio of 1.24, based on trailing 12 month sales, passes this criterion.


RELATIVE STRENGTH: PASS

The final criterion for the Cornerstone Growth Strategy requires that the Relative Strength of the company be among the top 50 of the stocks screened using the previous criterion. This gives you the opportunity to buy the growth stocks you are searching for just as the market is embracing them. URI, whose relative strength is 80, is in the top 50 and would pass this last criterion.



Watch List

The top scoring stocks not currently in the Hot List portfolio.

Ticker Company Name Current
Score
SKX SKECHERS USA INC 59%
CRTO CRITEO SA (ADR) 57%
LPLA LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC 55%
MBT MOBIL'NYE TELESISTEMY PAO (ADR) 52%
EME EMCOR GROUP INC 52%
ESNT ESSENT GROUP LTD 49%
TECK TECK RESOURCES LTD (USA) 47%
BBY BEST BUY CO INC 47%
TX TERNIUM SA (ADR) 47%
UFPI UNIVERSAL FOREST PRODUCTS, INC. 45%



Disclaimer

The names of individuals (i.e., the 'gurus') appearing in this report are for identification purposes of his methodology only, as derived by Validea.com from published sources, and are not intended to suggest or imply any affiliation with or endorsement or even agreement with this report personally by such gurus, or any knowledge or approval by such persons of the content of this report. All trademarks, service marks and tradenames appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners, and are likewise used for identification purposes only.

Validea is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or investment advisor either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory authority. Validea is not responsible for trades executed by users of this site based on the information included herein. The information presented on this website does not represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks or any financial instrument nor is it intended as an endorsement of any security or investment. The information on this website is generic by nature and is not personalized to the specific situation of any individual. The user therefore bears complete responsibility for their own investment research and should seek the advice of a qualified investment professional prior to making any investment decisions.

Performance results are based on model portfolios and do not reflect actual trading. Actual performance will vary based on a variety of factors, including market conditions and trading costs. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Individual stocks mentioned throughout this web site may be holdings in the managed portfolios of Validea Capital Management, a separate asset management firm founded by Validea.com founder John Reese. Validea Capital Management, which is a separate legal entity and an SEC registered investment advisory firm, uses, in part, the strategies on the web site to select stocks for its clients.