Economy and markets

Markets celebrated the third quarter's end on a high note, hitting records on the strength of technology stocks and closing out a period of continued low volatility. The fourth quarter has begun in much the same way, as markets cheer the prospect of tax reform in Washington and shake off the economic damage from recent hurricanes affecting the Southeastern United States and the Eastern Caribbean. Corporate earnings reporting season will soon start in full-force, and expectations are for the growth trend to continue for a third straight quarter.

The economic picture has continued to improve. The second quarter GDP figure was revised up to 3.1% from 3%. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 has risen 13.35%, to 2547.74 through Wednesday's close, with the biggest gains coming from information technology (+26.21%), healthcare (+20.44%), materials (15.82%, and industrials (+13.6%) sectors. Losers were led by energy (-8.77%) and telecommunications (-7.19%). The Nasdaq has climbed 21.39% this year to 6534.63, and the Dow Jones industrial average is up 14.67%, to a record 22,661.64.

Private payrolls in August jumped at their fastest pace in five months thanks to gains in construction and manufacturing, according to Wednesday's release by ADP and Moody's. Companies added 237,000 jobs, which is more than the 185,000 expected. The last time job creation in the ADP survey was this strong was March.

Personal income rose 0.2% in August and disposable personal income rose 0.1%. Personal consumption expenditures excluding food and energy rose 0.1%. The Federal Reserve left its benchmark interest rate alone, but indicated that it could hike later this year as it begins tapering off its bond purchase program this month. The central bank reduced its outlook for inflation from 1.7% this year to 1.5% and from 2% next year to 1.9%. That means the Fed is likely to miss its target 2% inflation rate until at least 2019.

Sales of new U.S. single family homes fell 3.4% in August to their lowest level in eight months, a surprise. Economists had seen sales rising 3.3%. Sales were down 12% on a year over year basis. Home prices nationally jumped 6.9% in August over the prior year, the biggest gain in three years.

U.S. factory activity hit a 13-year high in September amid strong gains in new orders and materials prices. The index of national factory activity rose to 60.8 from 58.8 in August. A reading above 50 indicates an expansion. New orders jumped to 64.6 in September from 60.3 in August. Construction spending rose 0.5% to $1.21 trillion. Durable goods orders rose 1.7% in August after falling 6.8% in July. Non-defense capital goods orders, excluding aircraft, rose 0.9% in August. The ISM said its index of national factory activity rose to 60.8, the highest since May 2004.

Recommended Reading

Many subscribers are familiar with Validea's Guru Investor blog (launched in 2008), in which we offer highlights of interesting articles and investment commentary that is helpful to investors and that we believe stands out from the daily market noise. In case you missed our recent posts, here's a short list:

Market timing pays off only modestly: Bloomberg columnist Nir Kaissar says regular investors are usually told to do the opposite of what professionals do. Read full post

Ray Dalio argues against rate hikes: The manager of the world's largest hedge fund told investors the Federal Reserve was making a mistake raising interest rates. Read full post

Yale's trouble with timber: University endowments snapped up timberlands as a hedge on inflation and for some of them it's not going so well. Read full post

Concerns about quant funds: Recalling the stunning rout in algorithmic trading a decade ago and the lessons quant managers are putting into practice today. Read full post

Buffett investing advice: On the 100th anniversary of Forbes, Warren Buffett gives the magazine his best advice and suggestions for investments everyone should make. Read full post

Market correction characteristics: Seeing as everyone is expecting the market to tumble at any minute, Barron's walks through what the next correction might look like. Read full post

Smart-beta insights from Research Affiliates: The firm's CIO, Chris Brightman, talked with Morningstar about smart-beta ETFs and many managers are launching new funds at the wrong time. Read full post

Global synchronicity comes into view: Global economic growth is continuing with all 45 countries tracked by the OECD on pace to gain this year, a rare synchronicity that suggests the world economy is hitting on all cylinders. Read full post

Podcasts of the week: Interviews with Artificial Intelligence Expert Martin Ford, DoubleLine's Jeffrey Sherman, and Outsiders author Will Thorndike. Read full post

Performance Update

Since our last newsletter, the S&P 500 returned 2.1%, while the Hot List returned 5.2%. So far in 2016, the portfolio has returned 23.2% vs. 14.0% for the S&P. Since its inception in July 2003, the Hot List is far outpacing the index, having gained 281.5% vs. the S&P's 155.1% gain.

News on the Hot List Stocks

Magna International (MGA) - The company said it had settled a lawsuit with KS Centoco under which it will give up its 23% equity interest in KS Centoco and pay CAD $25 million.

LGI Homes (LGIH) - The company announced the opening of its first development in Albuquerque, N.M., with 130 new homes priced from the $170s, a community park and children's playground, and walking paths.

Sunlife Financial (SLF) - The Toronto-based insurance and wealth management firm said its executive chair, Isabelle Hudon, would leave the company to take up her post as Canada's first female Ambassador to France.

Why Disciplined Investment Strategies are Best

Imagine a scenario in which you're unsure about directions, so you ask a friend if you could follow him in your car. He happily agrees, then tells you to turn right a mile before he does.

In some ways, talk about strategies to protect investors from "black swan" events-negative occurrences that lead to significant market declines--is similarly puzzling. The term, popularized in a 2007 best-selling book by scholar and risk analyst Nassim Nicholas Taleb, is derived from the once widespread but misguided belief that all swans are white. Rare, black swans are an ominous signal. For investors, black swan events have included the dot.com crash of 2000, the financial crisis of 2008, Black Monday (August 2015), and the Fukushima nuclear disaster of 2011.

But while there were certainly known forces at work leading up to each devastating event, the timing and scope of any one of them would have been impossible to predict.

This goes directly against human instinct to try to predict things, specifically, bad things. In a Collaborative Fund article earlier this year, Morgan Housel explains, "Hearing the world is going to hell is more interesting than forecasting that things will gradually get better over time, even if the latter is accurate for most people most of the time."

Billionaire investing legend Warren Buffett's investment philosophy is firmly rooted in the notion that investors should resist this human urge to predict catastrophe and guard against fear-based, knee-jerk reactions of any kind. In his opinion, this is an emotional attempt at market timing -- that is, moving in and out of markets based on what you think might happen.

Explaining his philosophy in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Buffett explained, "If I had owned 100% of a solid business with good long-term prospects, it would have been foolish for me to even consider dumping it. So why would I have sold my stocks that were small participations in wonderful businesses? True, any one of them might eventually disappoint, but as a group they were certain to do well."

Still, not all investors have the iron will and deep pockets Buffett has to withstand a black swan event, which is why strategies to help investors hedge the risk, such as hedge funds, rose in popularity in the aftermath of the crisis. Lately, hedge funds have fallen out of favor. The present bull market has seen a long stretch with nary a black swan in sight, and active managers until recently were having a tough time keeping up with the market.

But some fear that factors including today's stretched market valuations make a black swan more likely. Even if that's true, however, it doesn't necessarily mean that an investment strategy designed to protect an investor from a future black swan event will end up doing its job. Ben Carlson of Ritholtz Wealth Management offered a particularly keen perspective on the post-crisis investor's desire for "insurance" against a black swan event in a 2014 blog:

"In the aftermath of the crash, the fund industry took full advantage of the change in sentiment and rolled out a host of new funds that were supposed to help investors if there was another downturn -- long/short funds, tail-risk strategies, absolute return funds, option hedging strategies, tactical asset allocation funds and the like. Investors poured money into these funds with a heavy dose of hindsight bias by allowing the recent past to shape their investment decisions. Those who piled into these funds missed the idea completely. They were trying to plan ahead for uncertain events that could surprise everyone. Of course, this is impossible, because you can't hedge out the risks of unknown events ... they're unknown after all."

It may be easy to look back, now, eight years into a bull market, and make judgments about strategies that look to capitalize on black swan events given how poorly many have performed. However, the key lesson for investors is that the markets are never completely black and white and no strategy will always be the winning approach (as we've seen on Validea the models we run come in and out of favor every few years). Trying to time, or predict, the end of the current bull market, start of a bear market, beginning of a bull market or some exogenous and unforeseen event should be left to those who claim to be better equipped to make such predictions, as foolhardy as they may seem. The better plan is to find strategies that you understand, are built on long term track records, such as the the fundamental guru strategies we run here, are aligned with your risk tolerance, that you can stick with even if the markets don't deal you a good hand. In the end, investing with this mindset is better than betting too much on seeing a rare black swan that may not ever fly into view.


Portfolio Holdings
Ticker Date Added Return
AGX 5/5/2017 -2.7%
SAFM 11/18/2016 97.4%
BMA 7/1/2016 65.7%
MGA 6/2/2017 16.8%
MNST 9/22/2017 -0.7%
CTB 9/22/2017 3.5%
LMAT 7/28/2017 13.8%
ESNT 8/25/2017 5.1%
MAN 9/22/2017 4.9%
LGIH 8/25/2017 19.0%


Guru Analysis
Disclaimer: The analysis is from Validea's selection and interpretation of content from the guru's book or published writings, and is not from nor endorsed by the guru. See Full Disclaimer

AGX   |   SAFM   |   BMA   |   MGA   |   MNST   |   CTB   |   LMAT   |   ESNT   |   MAN   |   LGIH   |  

ARGAN, INC.

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Argan, Inc. is a holding company. The Company conducts operations through its subsidiaries, Gemma Power Systems, LLC and affiliates (GPS), Atlantic Projects Company Limited (APC), Southern Maryland Cable, Inc. (SMC) and The Roberts Company (Roberts). Through GPS and APC, the Company's power industry services segment provides engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, operations management, maintenance, development, technical and consulting services to the power generation and renewable energy markets. Through SMC, the telecommunications infrastructure services segment of the Company provides project management, construction, installation and maintenance services to commercial, local government and federal government customers. Through Roberts, the Company's industrial fabrication and field services segment produces, delivers and installs fabricated steel components specializing in pressure vessels and heat exchangers for industrial plants.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider AGX a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: PASS

The investor should examine the P/E (12.34) relative to the growth rate (32.48%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for AGX (0.38) is very favorable.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: NEUTRAL

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth rate high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. AGX, whose sales are $872.5 million, is not considered large enough to apply the P/E ratio analysis. However, an investor can analyze the P/E ratio relative to the EPS growth rate.


INVENTORY TO SALES: PASS

When inventories increase faster than sales, it is a red flag. However an increase of up to 5% is considered bearable if all other ratios appear attractive. Inventory to sales for AGX was 0.99% last year, while for this year it is 0.47%. Since inventory to sales has decreased from last year by -0.51%, AGX passes this test.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for AGX is 32.5%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is acceptable.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

This methodology would consider the Debt/Equity ratio for AGX (0.00%) to be wonderfully low (equity is at least ten times debt). This ratio is one quick way to determine the financial strength of the company.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for AGX (22.91%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: BONUS PASS

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for AGX (48.57%) is considered favorable.


SANDERSON FARMS, INC.

Strategy: Growth Investor
Based on: Martin Zweig

Sanderson Farms, Inc. is a poultry processing company. The Company is engaged in the production, processing, marketing and distribution of fresh and frozen chicken, and also preparation, processing, marketing and distribution of processed and minimally prepared chicken. It sells ice pack, chill pack, bulk pack and frozen chicken, in whole, cut-up and boneless form, under the Sanderson Farms brand name to retailers, distributors, casual dining operators, customers reselling frozen chicken into export markets. The Company, through its subsidiaries, Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Production Division) and Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Processing Division), conducts its chicken operations. Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Production Division) is engaged in the production of chickens to the broiler-stage. Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Foods Division) is engaged in the processing, sale and distribution of chickens. The Company, through Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Foods Division), conducts its prepared chicken business.


P/E RATIO: PASS

The P/E of a company must be greater than 5 to eliminate weak companies, but not more than 3 times the current Market P/E because the situation is much too risky, and never greater than 43. SAFM's P/E is 12.84, based on trailing 12 month earnings, while the current market PE is 21.00. Therefore, it passes the first test.


REVENUE GROWTH IN RELATION TO EPS GROWTH: FAIL

Revenue Growth must not be substantially less than earnings growth. For earnings to continue to grow over time they must be supported by a comparable or better sales growth rate and not just by cost cutting or other non-sales measures. SAFM's revenue growth is 2.92%, while it's earnings growth rate is 25.52%, based on the average of the 3 and 4 year historical eps growth rates. Therefore, SAFM fails this criterion.


SALES GROWTH RATE: PASS

Another important issue regarding sales growth is that the rate of quarterly sales growth is rising. To evaluate this, the change from this quarter last year to the present quarter (28%) must be examined, and then compared to the previous quarter last year compared to the previous quarter (15.9%) of the current year. Sales growth for the prior must be greater than the latter. For SAFM this criterion has been met.


The earnings numbers of a company should be examined from various different angles. Three of these angles are stability in the trend of earnings, earnings persistence, and earnings acceleration. To evaluate stability, the stock has to pass the following four criteria.


CURRENT QUARTER EARNINGS: PASS

The first of these criteria is that the current EPS be positive. SAFM's EPS ($5.09) pass this test.


QUARTERLY EARNINGS ONE YEAR AGO: PASS

The EPS for the quarter one year ago must be positive. SAFM's EPS for this quarter last year ($2.42) pass this test.


POSITIVE EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR CURRENT QUARTER: PASS

The growth rate of the current quarter's earnings compared to the same quarter a year ago must also be positive. SAFM's growth rate of 110.33% passes this test.


EARNINGS GROWTH RATE FOR THE PAST SEVERAL QUARTERS: PASS

Compare the earnings growth rate of the previous three quarters with long-term EPS growth rate. Earnings growth in the previous 3 quarters should be at least half of the long-term EPS growth rate. Half of the long-term EPS growth rate for SAFM is 12.76%. This should be less than the growth rates for the 3 previous quarters, which are 173.17%, 117.02%, and 41.23%. SAFM passes this test, which means that it has good, reasonably steady earnings.


This strategy looks at the rate which earnings grow and evaluates this rate of growth from different angles. The 4 tests immediately following are detailed below.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN PRIOR 3 QUARTERS: PASS

If the growth rate of the prior three quarter's earnings, 93.18%, (versus the same three quarters a year earlier) is less than the growth rate of the current quarter earnings, 110.33%, (versus the same quarter one year ago) then the stock passes.


EPS GROWTH FOR CURRENT QUARTER MUST BE GREATER THAN THE HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE: PASS

The EPS growth rate for the current quarter, 110.33% must be greater than or equal to the historical growth which is 25.52%. SAFM would therefore pass this test.


EARNINGS PERSISTENCE: FAIL

Companies must show persistent yearly earnings growth. To fulfill this requirement a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. SAFM, whose annual EPS growth before extraordinary items for the previous 5 years (from the earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 2.35, 5.68, 10.80, 9.52, and 8.37, fails this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

One final earnings test required is that the long-term earnings growth rate must be at least 15% per year. SAFM's long-term growth rate of 25.52%, based on the average of the 3 and 4 year historical eps growth rates, passes this test.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

A final criterion is that a company must not have a high level of debt. A high level of total debt, due to high interest expenses, can have a very negative effect on earnings if business moderately turns down. If a company does have a high level, an investor may want to avoid this stock altogether. SAFM's Debt/Equity (0.00%) is not considered high relative to its industry (172.07%) and passes this test.


INSIDER TRANSACTIONS: PASS

A factor that adds to a stock's attractiveness is if insider buy transactions number 3 or more, while insider sell transactions are zero. Zweig calls this an insider buy signal. For SAFM, this criterion has not been met (insider sell transactions are 1,141, while insiders buying number 323). Despite the fact that insider sells out number insider buys for this company, Zweig considers even one insider buy transaction enough to prevent an insider sell signal, therefore there is not an insider sell signal and the stock passes this criterion.


BANCO MACRO SA (ADR)

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Banco Macro SA is an Argnetina-based financial institution (the Bank) that offers traditional bank products and services to companies, including those operating in regional economies, as well as to individuals. In addition, the Bank performs certain transactions through its subsidiaries, including mainly Banco del Tucuman, Macro Bank Ltd, Macro Securities SA, Macro Fiducia SA and Macro Fondos SGFCI SA. It has approximately two categories of customers, such as retail customers, including individuals and entrepreneurs and corporate customers, which include small, medium and large companies and major corporations. In addition, it provides services to over four provincial governments. It provides its corporate customers with traditional banking products and services, such as deposits, lending (including overdraft facilities), check cashing advances and factoring, guaranteed loans and credit lines for financing foreign trade and cash management services.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider BMA a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: PASS

The investor should examine the P/E (18.56) relative to the growth rate (41.46%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for BMA (0.45) is very favorable.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: PASS

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. BMA, whose sales are $1,779.2 million, needs to have a P/E below 40 to pass this criterion. BMA's P/E of (18.56) is considered acceptable.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for BMA is 41.5%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is considered 'OK'. However, it may be difficult to sustain such a high growth rate.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: NEUTRAL

BMA is a financial company so debt to equity rules are not applied to determine the company's financial soundness.


EQUITY/ASSETS RATIO: PASS

This methodology uses the Equity/Assets Ratio as a way to determine a financial intermediary's health, as it is a better measure than the Debt/Equity Ratio. BMA's Equity/Assets ratio (19.00%) is very healthy and above the minimum 5% this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


RETURN ON ASSETS: PASS

This methodology uses Return on Assets as a way to measure a financial intermediary's profitability. BMA's ROA (4.50%) is above the minimum 1% that this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for BMA (9.03%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for BMA (-6.26%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC. (USA)

Strategy: Price/Sales Investor
Based on: Kenneth Fisher

Magna International Inc. (Magna) is a global automotive supplier. The Company's segments are North America, Europe, Asia, Rest of World, and Corporate and Other. The Company's product capabilities include producing body, chassis, exterior, seating, powertrain, electronic, active driver assistance, vision, closure, and roof systems and modules, as well as vehicle engineering and contract manufacturing. The Company has over 320 manufacturing operations and approximately 100 product development, engineering and sales centers in over 30 countries. It provides a range of body, chassis and engineering solutions to its original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers. It has capabilities in powertrain design, development, testing and manufacturing. It offers bumper fascia systems, exterior trim and modular systems. It offers exterior and interior mirror systems. It offers sealing, trim, engineered glass and module systems. It offers softtops, retractable hardtops, modular tops and hardtops.


PRICE/SALES RATIO: PASS

The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. Non-cyclical (non-Smokestack) companies with Price/Sales ratios below 0.75 are tremendous values and should be sought. MGA's P/S of 0.54 based on trailing 12 month sales, is below 0.75 which is considered quite attractive. It passes this methodology's P/S ratio test with flying colors.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

Less debt equals less risk according to this methodology. MGA's Debt/Equity of 31.96% is acceptable, thus passing the test.


PRICE/RESEARCH RATIO: PASS

This methodology considers companies in the Technology and Medical sectors to be attractive if they have low Price/Research ratios. MGA is neither a Technology nor Medical company. Therefore the Price/Research ratio is not available and, hence, not much emphasis should be placed on this particular variable.


PRELIMINARY GRADE: Some Interest in MGA At this Point

Is MGA a "Super Stock"? NO


PRICE/SALES RATIO: PASS

The prospective company should have a low Price/Sales ratio. Non-cyclical(non-Smokestack) companies with Price/Sales ratios below .75 are tremendous values and should be sought.MGA's P/S ratio of 0.54 is below .75 which is considered extremely attractive. It passes this methodology's P/S ratio test with flying colors.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH RATE: FAIL

This methodology looks for companies that have an inflation adjusted EPS growth rate greater than 15%. MGA's inflation adjusted EPS growth rate of 8.77% fails the test.


FREE CASH PER SHARE: PASS

This methodology looks for companies that have a positive free cash per share. Companies should have enough free cash available to sustain three years of losses. This is based on the premise that companies without cash will soon be out of business. MGA's free cash per share of 3.04 passes this criterion.


THREE YEAR AVERAGE NET PROFIT MARGIN: PASS

This methodology looks for companies that have an average net profit margin of 5% or greater over a three year period. MGA, whose three year net profit margin averages 5.77%, passes this evaluation.



MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP

Strategy: Value Investor
Based on: Benjamin Graham

Monster Beverage Corporation develops, markets, sells and distributes energy drink beverages, sodas and/or concentrates for energy drink beverages, primarily under various brand names, including Monster Energy, Monster Rehab, Monster Energy Extra Strength Nitrous Technology, Java Monster, Muscle Monster, Mega Monster Energy, Punch Monster, Juice Monster, Ubermonster, BU, Mutant Super Soda, Nalu, NOS, Burn, Mother, Ultra, Play and Power Play, Gladiator, Relentless, Samurai, BPM and Full Throttle. The Company has three segments: Monster Energy Drinks segment, which consists of its Monster Energy drinks, as well as Mutant Super Soda drinks; Strategic Brands segment, which includes various energy drink brands owned through The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC), and Other segment (Other), which includes the American Fruits & Flavors (AFF) third-party products. The Strategic Brands segment sells concentrates and/or beverage bases to authorized bottling and canning operations.


SECTOR: PASS

MNST is neither a technology nor financial Company, and therefore this methodology is applicable.


SALES: PASS

The investor must select companies of "adequate size". This includes companies with annual sales greater than $1 billion. MNST's sales of $3,190.9 million, based on trailing 12 month sales, pass this test.


CURRENT RATIO: PASS

The current ratio must be greater than or equal to 2. Companies that meet this criterion are typically financially secure and defensive. MNST's current ratio of 3.35 passes the test.


LONG-TERM DEBT IN RELATION TO NET CURRENT ASSETS: PASS

For industrial companies, long-term debt must not exceed net current assets (current assets minus current liabilities). Companies that meet this criterion display one of the attributes of a financially secure organization. The long-term debt for MNST is $0.0 million, while the net current assets are $1,318.9 million. MNST passes this test.


LONG-TERM EPS GROWTH: PASS

Companies must increase their EPS by at least 30% over a ten-year period and EPS must not have been negative for any year within the last 10 years. Companies with this type of growth tend to be financially secure and have proven themselves over time. MNST's EPS growth over that period of 410.0% passes the EPS growth test.


P/E RATIO: FAIL

The Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio, based on the greater of the current PE or the PE using average earnings over the last 3 fiscal years, must be "moderate", which this methodology states is not greater than 15. Stocks with moderate P/Es are more defensive by nature. MNST's P/E of 41.90 (using the current PE) fails this test.


PRICE/BOOK RATIO: FAIL

The Price/Book ratio must also be reasonable. That is, the Price/Book multiplied by P/E cannot be greater than 22. MNST's Price/Book ratio is 8.34, while the P/E is 41.90. MNST fails the Price/Book test.


COOPER TIRE & RUBBER CO

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company is a manufacturer and marketer of replacement tires. The Company specializes in the design, manufacture, marketing and sales of passenger car, light truck, medium truck, motorcycle, and racing tires. The Company operates through four segments: North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia. The North America segment comprises its operations in the United States and Canada. The Americas Tire Operations segment manufactures and markets passenger car and light truck tires, for sale in the United States replacement markets. The Latin America segment comprises its operations in Mexico, Central America, and South America. The European segment has operations in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Serbia. Its the United Kingdom entity manufactures and markets passenger car, light truck, motorcycle and racing tires and tire retread material. As of December 31, 2016, the Company operated nine manufacturing facilities and 20 distribution centers in 10 countries.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

CTB is considered a "True Stalwart", according to this methodology, as its earnings growth of 15.38% lies within a moderate 10%-19% range and its annual sales of $2,899 million are greater than the multi billion dollar level. This methodology looks for the "Stalwart" securities to gain 30%-50% in value over a two year period if they can be purchased at an attractive price based on the P/E to Growth ratio. CTB is attractive if CTB can hold its own during a recession.


INVENTORY TO SALES: PASS

When inventories increase faster than sales, it is a red flag. However an increase of up to 5% is considered bearable if all other ratios appear attractive. Inventory to sales for CTB was 13.88% last year, while for this year it is 16.07%. Since inventory has been rising, this methodology would not look favorably at the stock but would not completely eliminate it from consideration as the inventory increase (2.20%) is below 5%.


YIELD ADJUSTED P/E TO GROWTH (PEG) RATIO: PASS

The Yield-adjusted P/E/G ratio for CTB (0.62), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, is O.K.


EARNINGS PER SHARE: PASS

The EPS for a stalwart company must be positive. CTB's EPS ($3.61) would satisfy this criterion.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

This methodology would consider the Debt/Equity ratio for CTB (29.60%) to be acceptable (equity is three to ten times debt). This ratio is one quick way to determine the financial strength of the company.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for CTB (5.50%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for CTB (10.71%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


LEMAITRE VASCULAR INC

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. is a provider of medical devices for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. The Company develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and implants used primarily in the field of vascular surgery. It is engaged in the design, marketing, sales and technical support of medical devices and implants for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease industry segment. The Company's product lines include valvulotomes, balloon catheters, carotid shunts, biologic vascular patches, radiopaque marking tape, anastomotic clips, remote endarterectomy devices, laparoscopic cholecystectomy devices, prosthetic vascular grafts, biologic vascular grafts and powered phlebectomy devices. Its portfolio of peripheral vascular devices consists of brand name products that are used in arteries and veins outside of the heart, including the Expandable LeMaitre Valvulotome, the Pruitt F3 Carotid Shunt, VascuTape Radiopaque Tape and the XenoSure biologic patch.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider LMAT a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: FAIL

The investor should examine the P/E (55.54) relative to the growth rate (36.41%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for LMAT (1.53) is too high to add to the attractiveness of the stock.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: NEUTRAL

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth rate high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. LMAT, whose sales are $96.4 million, is not considered large enough to apply the P/E ratio analysis. However, an investor can analyze the P/E ratio relative to the EPS growth rate.


INVENTORY TO SALES: PASS

When inventories increase faster than sales, it is a red flag. However an increase of up to 5% is considered bearable if all other ratios appear attractive. Inventory to sales for LMAT was 19.40% last year, while for this year it is 19.02%. Since inventory to sales has decreased from last year by -0.38%, LMAT passes this test.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for LMAT is 36.4%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is considered 'OK'. However, it may be difficult to sustain such a high growth rate.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

This methodology would consider the Debt/Equity ratio for LMAT (0.00%) to be wonderfully low (equity is at least ten times debt). This ratio is one quick way to determine the financial strength of the company.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for LMAT (1.45%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for LMAT (3.15%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


ESSENT GROUP LTD

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

Essent Group Ltd. is a private mortgage insurance company. The Company is engaged in offering private mortgage insurance and reinsurance for mortgages secured by residential properties located in the United States. Its products and services include mortgage insurance, contract underwriting, and Bermuda-based insurance and reinsurance. The Company's primary mortgage insurance is offered to customers on individual loans at the time of origination on a flow basis, but can also be written in bulk transactions. Its pool insurance provides additional credit enhancement for certain secondary market and other mortgage transactions. The primary mortgage insurance operations were conducted through Essent Guaranty, Inc. which is a mortgage insurer licensed to write mortgage insurance in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as of December 31, 2016. It offers primary mortgage insurance, pool insurance and master policy. It provides contract underwriting services through CUW Solutions, LLC.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

ESNT is considered a "Stalwart", according to this methodology, for its earnings growth of 19.81%. This is based on based on the average of the 3 and 4 year historical eps growth rates using the current fiscal year eps estimate, which lies within a moderate 10%-19% range. This methodology looks for the "Stalwart" securities to gain 30%-50% in value over a two year period if they can be purchased at an attractive price based on the P/E to Growth ratio. However, ESNT is not considered a "True Stalwart" for its sales of $513 million are less than the multi-billion dollar level.


YIELD ADJUSTED P/E TO GROWTH (PEG) RATIO: PASS

The Yield-adjusted P/E/G ratio for ESNT (0.72), based on the average of the 3 and 4 year historical eps growth rates using the current fiscal year eps estimate, is O.K.


EARNINGS PER SHARE: PASS

The EPS for a stalwart company must be positive. ESNT's EPS ($2.81) would satisfy this criterion.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: NEUTRAL

ESNT is a financial company so debt to equity rules are not applied to determine the company's financial soundness.


EQUITY/ASSETS RATIO: PASS

This methodology uses the Equity/Assets Ratio as a way to determine a financial intermediary's health, as it is a better measure than the Debt/Equity Ratio. ESNT's Equity/Assets ratio (70.00%) is extremely healthy and above the minimum 5% this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


RETURN ON ASSETS: PASS

This methodology uses Return on Assets as a way to measure a financial intermediary's profitability. ESNT's ROA (13.70%) is above the minimum 1% that this methodology looks for, thus passing the criterion.


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for ESNT (7.26%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for ESNT (-3.88%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


MANPOWERGROUP INC.

Strategy: P/E/Growth Investor
Based on: Peter Lynch

ManpowerGroup Inc. is a provider of workforce solutions and services. The Company's segments include Americas, Southern Europe, Northern Europe, Asia Pacific Middle East (APME), Right Management and Corporate. The Company's Americas segment includes operations in the United States and Other Americas. Its Southern Europe segment includes operations in France, Italy and Other Southern Europe. Its Northern Europe segment includes operations in the United Kingdom, the Nordics, Germany and the Netherlands. The Company's APME operations provide a range of workforce solutions and services offered through Manpower, Experis and ManpowerGroup Solutions, including permanent, temporary and contract recruitment, assessment and selection, training and outsourcing. The Company's Right Management segment provides talent and career management workforce solutions. The Company provides services under its Experis brand, particularly in the areas of information technology (IT), engineering and finance.


DETERMINE THE CLASSIFICATION:

This methodology would consider MAN a "fast-grower".


P/E/GROWTH RATIO: PASS

The investor should examine the P/E (18.58) relative to the growth rate (20.56%), based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, for a company. This is a quick way of determining the fairness of the price. In this particular case, the P/E/G ratio for MAN (0.90) makes it favorable.


SALES AND P/E RATIO: PASS

For companies with sales greater than $1 billion, this methodology likes to see that the P/E ratio remain below 40. Large companies can have a difficult time maintaining a growth high enough to support a P/E above this threshold. MAN, whose sales are $19,976.3 million, needs to have a P/E below 40 to pass this criterion. MAN's P/E of (18.58) is considered acceptable.


EPS GROWTH RATE: PASS

This methodology favors companies that have several years of fast earnings growth, as these companies have a proven formula for growth that in many cases can continue many more years. This methodology likes to see earnings growth in the range of 20% to 50%, as earnings growth over 50% may be unsustainable. The EPS growth rate for MAN is 20.6%, based on the average of the 3, 4 and 5 year historical eps growth rates, which is considered very good.


TOTAL DEBT/EQUITY RATIO: PASS

This methodology would consider the Debt/Equity ratio for MAN (35.45%) to be normal (equity is approximately twice debt).


FREE CASH FLOW: NEUTRAL

The Free Cash Flow/Price ratio, though not a requirement, is considered a bonus if it is above 35%. A positive Cash Flow (the higher the better) separates a wonderfully reliable investment from a shaky one. This methodology prefers not to invest in companies that rely heavily on capital spending. This ratio for MAN (4.94%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of the stock. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


NET CASH POSITION: NEUTRAL

Another bonus for a company is having a Net Cash/Price ratio above 30%. Lynch defines net cash as cash and marketable securities minus long term debt. According to this methodology, a high value for this ratio dramatically cuts down on the risk of the security. The Net Cash/Price ratio for MAN (1.74%) is too low to add to the attractiveness of this company. Keep in mind, however, that it does not adversely affect the company as it is a bonus criteria.


LGI HOMES INC

Strategy: Growth/Value Investor
Based on: James P. O'Shaughnessy

LGI Homes, Inc. is a homebuilder and land developer. The Company is engaged in the design, construction, marketing and sale of new homes in markets in Texas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, South Carolina, North Carolina, Colorado, Washington and Tennessee. The Company operates through five segments: the Texas division, the Southwest division, the Southeast division, the Florida division and the Northwest division. The Texas division includes homebuilding operations in Houston, Dallas/Fort Worth, San Antonio and Austin locations. The Southwest division includes homebuilding operations in Phoenix, Tucson, Albuquerque, Denver and Colorado Springs locations. The Southeast division includes homebuilding operations in Atlanta, Charlotte and Nashville locations. The Florida division includes homebuilding operations in Tampa, Orlando, Fort Myers and Jacksonville locations. The Northwest division includes homebuilding operations in Seattle location.


MARKET CAP: PASS

The first requirement of the Cornerstone Growth Strategy is that the company has a market capitalization of at least $150 million. This will screen out the companies that are too illiquid for most investors, but still include a small growth company. LGIH, with a market cap of $1,127 million, passes this criterion.


EARNINGS PER SHARE PERSISTENCE: PASS

The Cornerstone Growth methodology looks for companies that show persistent earnings growth without regard to magnitude. To fulfill this requirement, a company's earnings must increase each year for a five year period. LGIH, whose annual EPS before extraordinary items for the last 5 years (from earliest to the most recent fiscal year) were 0.50, 1.07, 1.33, 2.44 and 3.41, passes this test.


PRICE/SALES RATIO: PASS

The Price/Sales ratio should be below 1.5. This value criterion, coupled with the growth criterion, identify growth stocks that are still cheap to buy. LGIH's Price/Sales ratio of 1.20, based on trailing 12 month sales, passes this criterion.


RELATIVE STRENGTH: PASS

The final criterion for the Cornerstone Growth Strategy requires that the Relative Strength of the company be among the top 50 of the stocks screened using the previous criterion. This gives you the opportunity to buy the growth stocks you are searching for just as the market is embracing them. LGIH, whose relative strength is 81, is in the top 50 and would pass this last criterion.



Watch List

The top scoring stocks not currently in the Hot List portfolio.

Ticker Company Name Current
Score
THO THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. 67%
SIG SIGNET JEWELERS LTD. 58%
IPGP IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION 53%
MC MOELIS & CO 51%
GGAL GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A. (ADR) 49%
SLF SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC 48%
TCX TUCOWS INC. (USA) 45%
HAS HASBRO, INC. 44%
CPB CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY 43%
APPF APPFOLIO INC 41%



Disclaimer

The names of individuals (i.e., the 'gurus') appearing in this report are for identification purposes of his methodology only, as derived by Validea.com from published sources, and are not intended to suggest or imply any affiliation with or endorsement or even agreement with this report personally by such gurus, or any knowledge or approval by such persons of the content of this report. All trademarks, service marks and tradenames appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners, and are likewise used for identification purposes only.

Validea is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or investment advisor either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory authority. Validea is not responsible for trades executed by users of this site based on the information included herein. The information presented on this website does not represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks or any financial instrument nor is it intended as an endorsement of any security or investment. The information on this website is generic by nature and is not personalized to the specific situation of any individual. The user therefore bears complete responsibility for their own investment research and should seek the advice of a qualified investment professional prior to making any investment decisions.

Performance results are based on model portfolios and do not reflect actual trading. Actual performance will vary based on a variety of factors, including market conditions and trading costs. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Individual stocks mentioned throughout this web site may be holdings in the managed portfolios of Validea Capital Management, a separate asset management firm founded by Validea.com founder John Reese. Validea Capital Management, which is a separate legal entity and an SEC registered investment advisory firm, uses, in part, the strategies on the web site to select stocks for its clients.